Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 17;29(1):131.
doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01719-5.

Concentration strategies for spiked and naturally present biomarkers in non-invasively collected first-void urine

Affiliations

Concentration strategies for spiked and naturally present biomarkers in non-invasively collected first-void urine

Laura Téblick et al. Eur J Med Res. .

Abstract

Background: First-void urine (FVU) provides a non-invasive method for collecting a wide range of biomarkers found in genital tract secretions. To optimize biomarker collection in FVU, this study investigated the impact of naturally present and supplemented precipitating agents: uromodulin (UMOD) and polyethylene glycol (PEG), on the concentration of human papillomavirus (HPV) pseudovirions (PsV), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), and cellular genomic DNA (gDNA) through centrifugation.

Methods: FVU samples from ten healthy female volunteers, along with a control sample, were spiked with seal herpesvirus 1 (PhHV-1) DNA, HPV16 plasmid DNA, and HPV16 PsV with an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter. The samples were subjected to various concentration protocols involving PEG precipitation, low-speed centrifugation (5 min at 1000×g), and medium-speed centrifugation (1 h at 3000×g). Subsequently, quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to assess cellular and cell-free glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) DNA, cell-free PhHV-1 and HPV16 DNA, and PsV (EGFP) DNA. In addition, UMOD levels were measured.

Results: The findings revealed that PEG significantly increased the concentration of cfDNA and gDNA in the pellet after centrifugation, with the most pronounced effect observed for cfDNA. Moreover, low-speed centrifugation without PEG effectively depleted cellular gDNA while preserving cfDNA in the supernatants. Pseudovirions were consistently pelleted, even with low-speed centrifugation, and a positive but not significant effect of PEG on PsV (EGFP) DNA yield in the pellet was observed. Additionally, a significant correlation was observed between UMOD and GAPDH, HPV16, and PsV (EGFP) DNA quantities in the pellet. Furthermore, large variations among the FVU samples were observed.

Conclusions: With this study, we provide novel insights into how various biomarker precipitation protocols, including both the properties of FVU and the use of PEG as a precipitating agent, influence the concentration of cfDNA, cellular gDNA, and pseudovirions.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Concentration; FVU; First-void urine; Human papillomavirus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.V. is a co-founder and former board member of Novosanis (Subsidiary of OraSure Technologies Inc, Wijnegem, Belgium), a spin-off company of the University of Antwerp, and was a minority shareholder until January 2019. The University of Antwerp received grants from Merck, GSK, Hologic, Abbott, Roche, and Cepheid to support the HPV Prevention and Control Board. The University of Antwerp received a project grant and honoraria fee for lectures, presentations, and speaker bureaus from Merck. Other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic overview. First-void urine (FVU) samples were collected from 10 female volunteers. Aliquots of 1 ml of the FVU and the control sample were spiked with HPV16 PsV, PhHV-1 DNA, and HPV16 plasmid DNA. Also, one aliquot was not spiked. All the samples underwent biomarker precipitation using six different protocols; (1) precipitation of unspiked samples without PEG (Usp-NP), (2) precipitation of spiked samples without PEG (Sp-NP), (3) precipitation using 10% (w/v) PEG6000, (4) precipitation using 8% (w/v) PEG20000, (5) low-speed centrifugation followed by precipitation of the supernatant using 10% (w/v) PEG6000, and (6) low-speed centrifugation followed by precipitation of the supernatant using 8% (w/v) PEG20000. Supernatants and pellets were collected for all purifications and qPCR was performed for GAPDH, PhHV-1, HPV16, and PsV (EGFP). In addition, ELISA for UMOD was performed
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Boxplots representing the amount of A GAPDH; B PhHV-1; C HPV16; and D PsV (EGFP) DNA in the respective samples. Results are presented as nanograms (ng), arbitrary DNA copies, and DNA copies. The spiked—No PEG arm did not undergo PEG treatment, whereas the other arms were incubated with 10% (w/v) PEG6000 or 8% (w/v) PEG20000 for approximately 16 h at 4 °C. All the samples were centrifuged at 3000×g at 4 °C for 1 h and the low-speed centrifugation (LSC) samples were subjected to low-speed centrifugation without PEG addition at 1000×g for 5 min before subsequent PEG precipitation. Significant differences between the pellet and supernatant for each arm are presented in the figure
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Boxplots representing the amount of A GAPDH; B PhHV-1; C HPV16; and D PsV (EGFP) DNA in the respective samples after various centrifugation steps. Results are presented as ng, arbitrary copies, and DNA copies. All 1 ml samples were spiked with the same amount of PhHV-1 DNA, HPV16 plasmid DNA and HPV16 PsV (EGFP). The samples were centrifuged at 1000×g at 4 °C for 5 min or at 3000×g at 4 °C for 1 h. Centrifugation at 1000×g was performed before both PEG precipitation protocols, resulting in two data points per ID for this arm. Significant differences between the pellet and supernatant for centrifugation conditions are presented in the figure
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Correlation plots between the amount of A GAPDH; B PhHV-1; C HPV16; and D PsV (EGFP) DNA and UMOD in the pellet. Spearman rank correlation coefficients are presented in the figure with, and without (w/o) inclusion of the Sp-NP arm data

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Herold BC, Mesquita PM, Madan RP, Keller MJ. Female genital tract secretions and semen impact the development of microbicides for the prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;65(3):325–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00932.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Massé J, Watrin T, Laurent A, Deschamps S, Guerrier D, Pellerin I. The developing female genital tract: from genetics to epigenetics. Int J Dev Biol. 2009;53:411–424. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.082680jm. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vorsters A, Van Damme P, Clifford G. Urine testing for HPV: rationale for using first void. BMJ. 2014;349(October):6252. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6252. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pattyn J, Van Keer S, Téblick L, Van Damme P, Vorsters A. HPV DNA detection in urine samples of women: ‘an efficacious and accurate alternative to cervical samples?’. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2019;17:755–757. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1668776. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Pauw H, Donders G, Weyers S, De Sutter P, Doyen J, Tjalma WAA, et al. Cervical cancer screening using HPV tests on self-samples: attitudes and preferences of women participating in the VALHUDES study. Arch Public Health. 2021;79(1):1–9. - PMC - PubMed