Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024;247(2):95-106.
doi: 10.1159/000535930. Epub 2024 Feb 16.

Clinical Landscape of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy in Germany: Retina.net CSC Registry Report Number 1

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Clinical Landscape of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy in Germany: Retina.net CSC Registry Report Number 1

Clemens A Lange et al. Ophthalmologica. 2024.

Abstract

Introduction: The German Registry of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) collects data on CSC patients in a nationwide multicenter approach to analyze epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentations, as well as diagnosis and treatment patterns.

Methods: In this multicenter cohort study, patients with CSC were enrolled in nine tertiary referral centers in Germany between January 2022 and June 2023. After consenting to the study, demographic data, risk factors, reported symptoms, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), funduscopic findings, disease severity, and diagnostic and treatment decisions were recorded and analyzed.

Results: A total of 539 eyes of 411 CSC patients were enrolled in this study including 308 males (75%) and 103 females (25%). Patients were predominantly of Caucasian origin and had a mean age of 55.5 years (IQR 41.0-70.0). 28% of eyes were classified as acute (<4 months duration) CSC, 28% as chronic (>4 months duration) CSC, 21% as inactive CSC, 11% as chronic atrophic CSC, and 12% as CSC with secondary CNV. 128 patients (31%) demonstrated bilateral CSC. The most common risk factors reported were psychological stress (52%), smoking (38%), arterial hypertension (38%), and a history of or current use of steroids (30%). Most frequently encountered symptoms included decreased visual acuity (76%), metamorphopsia (49%), relative scotoma (47%), blurred vision (19%), and dyschromatopsia (9%). The mean logMAR BCVA on initial examination was 0.2 (≈20/30, IQR 0.2-0.4) but showed significant variation with a tendency of lower BCVA in chronic cases. At the baseline visit, 74% of the overall cohort received no treatment, while 19% underwent local treatment and only 2% underwent systemic treatment. Of the local therapies, anti-VEGF injections were the most frequently performed procedure (33%, mainly for secondary CNV), followed by micropulse laser (28%), focal nonpulsed laser (23%), verteporfin photodynamic therapy (14%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops (2%). Among intravitreal anti-VEGF agents, aflibercept was used most frequently, followed by bevacizumab and ranibizumab.

Conclusion: This registry represents one of the largest cohorts of European patients with CSC to date. Patient age and the proportion of women were higher than expected and bilateral active disease was lower than anticipated, highlighting that neither age nor gender should be overemphasized when diagnosing CSC. Therapeutic interventions are heterogeneous and include verteporfin photodynamic therapy, micropulse laser, and anti-VEGF injections in case of secondary CNV.

Keywords: Central serous chorioretinopathy; Demographics; Incidence; Registry; Retina.net; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Epidemiology of included patients on the day of informed consent. Male/female distribution (a), boxplot of age distribution within the whole cohort (b), and employment status of participants (c). Distribution (d) and age (e) of different CSC subgroups. aCSC, acute CSC; cCSC, chronic CSC; iCSC, inactive CSC; caCSC, chronic atrophic CSC; CSC w 2° CNV, CSC with secondary CNV.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Risk factor analysis on the day of informed consent. a 82% of patients reported known CSC-related risk factors. b Distribution of risk factors in % for all patients (b) and patients in different subgroups (c). aCSC, acute CSC; cCSC, chronic CSC; iCSC, inactive CSC; caCSC, chronic atrophic CSC; CSC w 2° CNV, CSC complicated by 2° choroidal neovascularization.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Presenting symptoms at the time of inclusion and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in all patients (a, b) and in different subgroups (c, d). aCSC, acute CSC; cCSC, chronic CSC; iCSC, inactive CSC; caCSC, chronic atrophic CSC; CSC w 2° CNV, CSC complicated by a secondary choroidal neovascularization.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Fundus findings and imaging modalities performed for all patients (a, b) and in different subgroups (c, d). SRF, subretinal fluid; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; SD-OCT, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography; FAF, fundus autofluorescence; FA, fluorescein angiography; OCT-A, optical coherence tomography angiography; ICGA, indocyanine green angiography; EDI-ODT, enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography; aCSC, acute CSC; cCSC, chronic CSC; iCSC, inactive CSC; caCSC, chronic atrophic CSC; CSC w 2° CNV, CSC complicated by secondary choroidal neovascularization.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Therapeutic decisions on the day of study inclusion for all patients (a) and different CSC subgroups (c). Local treatment decision on the day of study inclusion for all patients (b) and different CSC subgroups (d). Anti-VEGF drugs (e) and type of verteporfin photodynamic therapy (f) applied. Tx, treatment; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factors; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; aCSC, acute CSC; cCSC, chronic CSC; iCSC, inactive CSC; caCSC, chronic atrophic CSC; CSC w 2° CNV, CSC complicated by a secondary choroidal neovascularization; hd, half-dose; hf, half-fluence; ff/fd, full-fluence, full-dose.

References

    1. Von Graefe A. Über zentrale rezidivierende Retinitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1866;12:221.
    1. Lange C, Treumer F, Bertram B, Feltgen N, Hoerauf H, Pauleikhoff D, et al. . Chorioretinopathia centralis serosa (CCS). Stellungnahme der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, der Retinologischen Gesellschaft und des Berufsverbandes der Augenärzte Deutschlands. Der Ophthalmologe: Zeitschrift Der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft; 2022. print; last updated.10.2021.
    1. Pauleikhoff L, Agostini H, Lange C. [Central serous chorioretinopathy]. Ophthalmologe. 2021;118(9):967–80. - PubMed
    1. van Rijssen TJ, van Dijk EHC, Yzer S, Ohno-Matsui K, Keunen JEE, Schlingemann RO, et al. . Central serous chorioretinopathy: towards an evidence-based treatment guideline. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;73:100770. - PubMed
    1. Daruich A, Matet A, Marchionno L, De Azevedo JD, Ambresin A, Mantel I, et al. . Acute central serous chorioretinopathy: factors influencing episode duration. Retina. 2017;37(10):1905–15. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types