This is a preprint.
Cell cycle perturbation uncouples mitotic progression and invasive behavior in a post-mitotic cell
- PMID: 38370624
- PMCID: PMC10871222
- DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.16.533034
Cell cycle perturbation uncouples mitotic progression and invasive behavior in a post-mitotic cell
Update in
-
Cell cycle perturbation uncouples mitotic progression and invasive behavior in a post-mitotic cell.Differentiation. 2024 May-Jun;137:100765. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2024.100765. Epub 2024 Mar 11. Differentiation. 2024. PMID: 38522217 Free PMC article.
Abstract
The acquisition of the post-mitotic state is crucial for the execution of many terminally differentiated cell behaviors during organismal development. However, the mechanisms that maintain the post-mitotic state in this context remain poorly understood. To gain insight into these mechanisms, we used the genetically and visually accessible model of C. elegans anchor cell (AC) invasion into the vulval epithelium. The AC is a terminally differentiated uterine cell that normally exits the cell cycle and enters a post-mitotic state, initiating contact between the uterus and vulva through a cell invasion event. Here, we set out to identify the set of negative cell cycle regulators that maintain the AC in this post-mitotic, invasive state. Our findings revealed a critical role for CKI-1 (p21CIP1/p27KIP1) in redundantly maintaining the post-mitotic state of the AC, as loss of CKI-1 in combination with other negative cell cycle regulators-including CKI-2 (p21CIP1/p27KIP1), LIN-35 (pRb/p107/p130), FZR-1 (Cdh1/Hct1), and LIN-23 (β-TrCP)-resulted in proliferating ACs. Remarkably, time-lapse imaging revealed that these ACs retain their ability to invade. Upon examination of a node in the gene regulatory network controlling AC invasion, we determined that proliferating, invasive ACs do so by maintaining aspects of pro-invasive gene expression. We therefore report that the requirement for a post-mitotic state for invasive cell behavior can be bypassed following direct cell cycle perturbation.
Keywords: C. elegans; CKI-1; dichotomy; invasion; proliferation.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests D.Q.M. is a paid employee of Arcadia Science.
Figures





References
-
- Boxem M. and van den Heuvel S. (2001). lin-35 Rb and cki-1 Cip/Kip cooperate in developmental regulation of G1 progression in C. elegans. Development 128, 4349–4359. - PubMed
-
- Boxem M. and van den Heuvel S. (2002). C. elegans Class B Synthetic Multivulva Genes Act in G1 Regulation. Current Biology 12, 906–911. - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous