Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 19;16(1):e52544.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.52544. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Is There an Over-Indication for Elective Tracheostomy in Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer?

Affiliations

Is There an Over-Indication for Elective Tracheostomy in Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer?

Diana Breda et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Objectives: Temporary tracheostomies (TT) are often used in oral oncologic surgery to secure the postoperative airway. Our primary objective was to determine if there was an over-indication for elective tracheostomy in our population. If so, our secondary objective was to ascertain which patients could have possibly avoided TT.

Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in which resection with curative intent and TT were performed. Variables collected included demographics, comorbidities, and complications. Additionally, we retrospectively applied the Cameron and TRACHY tracheostomy scoring systems to evaluate overall tracheostomy recommendations.

Results: A total of 116 elective tracheostomies were performed between January 2019 and December 2020. According to the Cameron and TRACHY scoring systems, recommendations for tracheostomy coincided in only 54.3% and 45.7%, respectively. Tumor anatomy and type of reconstruction were associated with less time until decannulation. Additionally, in patients without TT recommendation determined by both scores with tumor anatomy and location, as well as T and N stages were also associated with less time until decannulation.

Conclusion: There appears to be an over-indication for elective tracheostomy in our patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer. The patients that could have potentially avoided elective TT were those with lateral anatomy, without flap or with fasciocutaneous flap, location in the mandibular alveolus or anterior tongue, as well as N0/N1 and T1/T2 patients.

Keywords: complications; elective tracheostomy; head and neck cancer; oral cancer; tracheostomy scoring system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study workflow for patients that could have avoided elective TT

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Early postoperative care for free flap head & neck reconstructive surgery - a national survey of practice. Marsh M, Elliott S, Anand R, Brennan PA. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;47:182–185. - PubMed
    1. Analysis of tracheostomy-associated morbidity after operations for head and neck cancer. Halfpenny W, McGurk M. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;38:509–512. - PubMed
    1. Airway management and postoperative length of hospital stay in patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgery. Siddiqui AS, Dogar SA, Lal S, Akhtar S, Khan FA. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016;32:49–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. TRACHY score: a simple and effective guide to management of the airway in head and neck cancer. Mohamedbhai H, Ali S, Dimasi I, Kalavrezos N. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56:709–714. - PubMed
    1. Factors contributing to delayed decannulation of temporary tracheostomies following free tissue reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer. Littlewood CG, Jebril A, Lowe D, Konig R, Groom P, Rogers SN. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;59:472–477. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources