Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Nov-Dec;27(6):480-485.
doi: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_250_23. Epub 2024 Jan 11.

Sociocrinology: Impact of Social Media on Endocrine Health - A Review

Jaideep Khare  1   2 , Sanjay Kalra  3 , Sushil Jindal  1
Affiliations
Review

Sociocrinology: Impact of Social Media on Endocrine Health - A Review

Jaideep Khare et al. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Social media (SM) refers to social networking sites (SNSs), which are defined as online services that enable individuals to build a public or semi-public profile and give them the opportunity to create a network of contacts and interact. SM affects all aspects of life and may offer new opportunities to explore new experiences and perspectives of life because of its feasibility. But several times, because of feasibility, misinformation is generated intentionally or unintentionally, which spreads rapidly, and such misinformation can affect all aspects of life. However, health-related misinformation can be life-threatening to individuals. Endocrinology is the branch of medicine that deals with endocrine glands and hormones, which regulates mood, growth, development, metabolism and the way our organ works to maintain internal homeostasis. SM usage and endocrine health impact each other in both positive and negative ways. So, in this review, we will discuss about the effect of SM on Endocrine health.

Keywords: Cognitive bias; endocrine health; neurotransmitters; social media; sociocrinology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Boyd DM, Ellison NB. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2007;13:210–30.
    1. Adbe1a27-e2d2-5529-2f50-6872239bbff7.pdf. [[Last accessed on 2020 Jul 15]]. Available from: https://www.statistics.gr/documents/20181/adbe1a27-e2d2-5529-2f50-687223... .
    1. Dadiotis A, Bacopoulou F, Kokka I, Vlachakis D, Chrousos GP, Darviri C, et al. Validation of the Greek version of the Bergen social media addiction scale in undergraduate students. EMBnet J. 2021;26:e975. doi:10.14806/ej. 26.1.975. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wanga Y, McKee M, Torbica A, Stuckler D. Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Soc Sci Med. 2019;240:112552. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed. 2019.112552. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weitekamp CA, Hofmann HA. Human population density and reproductive health: A changing world needs endocrinology. Endocrinology. 2021;162:bqab198. doi:10.1210/endocr/bqab198. - PMC - PubMed