Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 31:11:1342930.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1342930. eCollection 2024.

Cloprostenol sodium improves reproductive performance of multiparous sows during lactation

Affiliations

Cloprostenol sodium improves reproductive performance of multiparous sows during lactation

Xuedan Zhu et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of prostaglandin F (PGF) analog (D-cloprostenol sodium and DL-cloprostenol sodium) administration on the milk yield of multiparous sows (MS) and piglet growth performance. In total, 320 Landrace×Yorkshire parturient MS were randomly divided into three groups on day 115 of pregnancy: without treatment (N = 50), with 75 μg D-cloprostenol sodium (N = 137), and with 200 μg DL-cloprostenol sodium (N = 133). After delivery, the sows treated with D-cloprostenol sodium and DL-cloprostenol sodium were randomly allocated into three subgroups, respectively: (i) no additional treatment after farrowing; (ii) administration of cloprostenol sodium at 3 h and 5 days after farrowing; and (iii) administration of cloprostenol sodium at 3 h, 5 days, and 10 days after farrowing. Cloprostenol sodium effectively induced sows to synchronize parturition approximately 23 h after administration and increased the daytime delivery rates (p < 0.05). Compared with DL-cloprostenol sodium, D-cloprostenol sodium shortened the farrowing duration and birth interval of sows for inducing farrowing (p < 0.05). Moreover, we observed that a single administration of both D-cloprostenol sodium and DL-cloprostenol sodium a day before delivery significantly reduced the rates of stillborn piglets type II in MS (p < 0.05). Compared to no treatment and single treatment with cloprostenol sodium, quartic treatments with cloprostenol sodium significantly increased the daily feed intake of MS, litter weight after weaning, and average daily gain of piglets (p < 0.05). Cloprostenol sodium improved the 21-day milk yield, with D-cloprostenol sodium showing the best effect, which increased lactation ability by 30.30% (176.72 kg vs. 135.63 kg) (p < 0.05). DL-cloprostenol sodium followed closely, increasing lactation ability by approximately 25.00% (169.71 kg vs. 135.63 kg) (p < 0.05). During lactation, sows administered with D-cloprostenol sodium observed increased serum prolactin levels. Compared to untreated sows, the sows administered with D-cloprostenol sodium and multiple DL-cloprostenol sodium visibly shortened the weaning-to-estrus interval (WEI) and weaning-to-service interval (WSI) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, quartic injections of D-cloprostenol sodium resulted in an 18 percentage point increase in the pregnancy rate of breeding sows compared to controls (82.61% vs. 64.58%) (p > 0.05). In summary, cloprostenol sodium could enhance the reproductive performance of MS, particularly in terms of lactation performance. Additionally, the effect of quartic injections of D-cloprostenol sodium was the most pronounced.

Keywords: D-cloprostenol sodium; DL-cloprostenol sodium; farrowing induction; milk performance; multiparous sow; reproductive performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of activities and protocol for the synchronization of parturition and timed treatment, sampling, examining, weaning, and artificial insemination. Control, multiparous sows not supplemented with cloprostenol sodium; D-cloprostenol sodium, the sows treated with 75 μg D-cloprostenol sodium; DL-cloprostenol sodium, the sows injected with 200 μg DL-cloprostenol sodium. The BT in diagram represents the evaluation of sows’ back fat thickness at 110 days of gestation and 20 days postpartum. The ↓ in the diagram indicates the time of administration of D-cloprostenol sodium or DL-cloprostenol sodium. The B and M in drawing show the time of blood sampling and milk sampling, respectively. The P, W, AI, and PS in figure depict the time of parturition, weaning, artificial insemination, and pregnancy testing, respectively. The single, triple, and quartic indicate the frequency of D-cloprostenol sodium or DL-cloprostenol sodium administration to multiparous sows.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Concentration (%) of lactose (A), fat (B), and protein (C) in colostrum from multiparous sows within 12 h after parturition, as well as mature milk on the days 8 and 16 of lactation in both the control and treatment groups. Multiparous sows did not receive any additional treatment (Control, n = 3) and received 75 μg/time D-cloprostenol sodium (n = 3) and 200 μg/time DL-cloprostenol sodium (n = 3) quartic treatments, which were administered 24 h before delivery, 3 h and 5 days after delivery, and 3 h, 5 days, and 10 days after delivery, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of D-cloprostenol sodium or DL-cloprostenol sodium on serum prolactin (PRL) levels (A), estradiol-17β (E2) levels (B), progesterone (P4) levels (C), and cortisol (COR) levels (D) in multiparous sows during lactation (Means ± SD). Multiparous sows without any additional treatment (n = 3) and those treated with 75 μg/time D-cloprostenol sodium (n = 3) and 200 μg/time DL-cloprostenol sodium (n = 3) were induced by quartic treatments 24 h before delivery, 3 h and 5 days after delivery, and 3 h, 5 days, and 10 days after delivery, respectively. The ↓ in the image indicates the time of administration of 75 μg D-cloprostenol sodium or 200 μg DL-cloprostenol sodium. The initial blood collection was conducted 3 h post the initial dosage, which merits mention. a,bDifferent superscripts within the same time point of blood collection differ significantly (p < 0.05).

References

    1. Decaluwe R, Maes D, Cools A, Wuyts B, De Smet S, Marescau B, et al. . Effect of Peripartal feeding strategy on colostrum yield and composition in sows. J Anim Sci. (2014) 92:3557–67. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7612, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hasan S, Orro T, Valros A, Junnikkala S, Peltoniemi O, Oliviero C. Factors affecting sow colostrum yield and composition, and their impact on piglet growth and health. Livest Sci. (2019) 227:60–7. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2019.07.004 - DOI
    1. Devillers N, Le Dividich J, Prunier A. Influence of colostrum intake on piglet survival and immunity. Animal. (2011) 5:1605–12. doi: 10.1017/S175173111100067X, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boonraungrod N, Sutthiya N, Kumwan P, Tossakui P, Nuntapaitoon M, Muns R, et al. . Control of parturition in swine using Pgf2α in combination with Carbetocin. Livest Sci. (2018) 214:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2018.05.012 - DOI
    1. Vallet JL, Miles JR. The effect of farrowing induction on colostrum and piglet serum Immunocrits is dependent on parity. J Anim Sci. (2017) 95:688–96. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.0993, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources