Association of Remaining Anterior Knee Laxity With Inferior Outcomes After Revision ACL Reconstruction
- PMID: 38371998
- PMCID: PMC10870811
- DOI: 10.1177/23259671231219695
Association of Remaining Anterior Knee Laxity With Inferior Outcomes After Revision ACL Reconstruction
Abstract
Background: The relationship between remaining anterior knee laxity and poorer clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may be underrated, and the criteria for failure of revision ACLR have not been defined.
Purpose/hypothesis: To evaluate a possible association between remaining knee laxity and functional scores in patients after revision ACLR. We hypothesized that a postoperative side-to-side-difference (SSD) in knee laxity of ≥6 mm will be an objective parameter for failure.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: A total of 200 patients (77 women and 123 men; mean age, 30.8 ± 11 years; range, 18-61 years) who underwent revision ACLR between 2016 and 2019 were evaluated; The mean follow-up period was 30.2 ± 9 months (range, 24-67 months). Patients were divided into 3 groups according to postoperative SSD (<3 mm, 3-5 mm, or ≥6 mm). Preoperative and postoperative outcome measures (Lachman, pivot shift, visual analog scale [VAS] for pain, Tegner, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) were compared between the groups.
Results: Of the 200 patients, 74% (n = 148) had a postoperative SSD of <3 mm at the latest follow-up, 19.5% (n = 39) had a postoperative SSD of 3 to 5 mm, and 6.5% (n = 13) had a postoperative SSD of ≥6 mm. Patients in all groups saw significant pre- to postoperative reductions in positive Lachman and pivot-shift tests as well as significant improvements in VAS pain, Lysholm, and Tegner scores (P < .001 for all). All postoperative functional scores of the patients with SSDs of <3 mm and 3-5 mm were significantly increased compared with those of patients with an SSD of ≥6 mm (P≤ .01 for all).
Conclusion: In patients following revision ACLR, anterior and rotational knee laxity were successfully reduced while increasing postoperative functional outcomes. A remaining postoperative SSD of ≥6 mm was associated with inferior patient outcomes compared with an SSD <6 mm. An SSD of ≥6 mm represents an objective parameter in the definition of failure of revision ACLR.
Keywords: failure criteria ACL surgery; inferior patients’ outcome correlates with laxity; revision ACL reconstruction; side-to-side- difference knee.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Ethik-Kommission der Aerztekammer Hamburg (reference No. PV5590).
Figures
Similar articles
-
Anterior Laxity at 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Comparable When Using Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Fixation and Interference Screw Fixation.Am J Sports Med. 2018 Aug;46(10):2366-2375. doi: 10.1177/0363546518784005. Epub 2018 Jul 17. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 30015501
-
Additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis in revision ACL reconstruction does not influence the outcome of patients with low-grade anterior knee laxity.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Feb;142(2):291-299. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04145-y. Epub 2021 Aug 29. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022. PMID: 34455475 Free PMC article.
-
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores knee laxity but shows inferior functional knee outcome compared with primary reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):137-145. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5059-3. Epub 2018 Jul 17. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019. PMID: 30014185 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcomes and Osteoarthritis at Very Long-term Follow-up After ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jan 7;10(1):23259671211062238. doi: 10.1177/23259671211062238. eCollection 2022 Jan. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 35024368 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes of 1- Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2021 Mar;49(3):798-804. doi: 10.1177/0363546520923090. Epub 2020 Jul 16. Am J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 32673067
References
-
- Alm L, Drenck TC, Frosch KH, Akoto R. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis in patients with revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and high-grade anterior knee instability. Knee. 2020;27(5):1451-1457. - PubMed
-
- Ayeni OR, Chahal M, Tran MN, Sprague S. Pivot shift as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(4):767-777. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources