Evaluating the Need for Simultaneous Carpal Tunnel Release With Forearm Fasciotomy
- PMID: 38372690
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.01.004
Evaluating the Need for Simultaneous Carpal Tunnel Release With Forearm Fasciotomy
Abstract
Purpose: The need to include simultaneous carpal tunnel release (sCTR) with forearm fasciotomy for acute compartment syndrome (ACS) or after vascular repair is unclear. We hypothesized that sCTR is more common when: 1) fasciotomies are performed by orthopedic or plastic surgeons, rather than general or vascular surgeons; 2) ACS occurred because of crush, blunt trauma, or fractures rather than vascular/reperfusion injuries; 3) elevated compartment pressures were documented. We also sought to determine the incidence of delayed CTR when not performed simultaneously.
Methods: Retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent forearm fasciotomy for ACS or vascular injury over a period of 10 years. Patient demographics, mechanism of ACS or indication for fasciotomy, surgeon subspecialty, compartment pressure measurements, inclusion of sCTR, complications, reoperations, and timing and method of definitive closure were analyzed. Logistic regression modeling was used to analyze predictors associated with delayed CTR.
Results: Fasciotomies were performed in 166 patients by orthopedic (63%), plastic (28%), and general/vascular (9%) surgeons. Orthopedic and plastic surgeons more frequently performed sCTR (67% and 63%, respectively). A total of 107 (65%) patients had sCTR. Fasciotomies for vascular/reperfusion injury were more likely to include sCTR (44%) compared with other mechanisms. If not performed simultaneously, 11 (19%) required delayed CTR at a median of 42 days. ACS secondary to fracture had the highest rate of delayed CTR (35%), and the necessity of late CTR for fractures was not supported by the logistic regression model. Residual hand paresthesias were less frequent in the sCTR group (6.5% vs 20%). Overall complication rates were similar in both groups (63% sCTR vs 70% without sCTR).
Conclusion: When sCTR is excluded during forearm fasciotomy, 19% of patients required delayed CTR. This rate was higher (35%) when ACS was associated with fractures. Simultaneous CTR with forearm fasciotomy may decrease the incidence of residual hand paresthesias and the need for a delayed CTR.
Type of study/level of evidence: Prognosis IV.
Keywords: Carpal tunnel; compartment syndrome; fasciotomy; median nerve.
Copyright © 2024 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
Similar articles
-
A Small Number of Surgeons Perform the Large Majority of Uncommon Nerve Decompression Procedures.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2182-2190. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003162. Epub 2024 Jun 21. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 38905446
-
Early Versus Delayed Definitive Fixation Relative to Fasciotomy Closure in High-Energy Tibial Plateau Fractures With Compartment Syndrome.J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jun 1;38(6):195-200. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002802. J Orthop Trauma. 2024. PMID: 38466820
-
More Harm Than Good: It is Time to Reconsider Prophylactic Fasciotomy in Lower-Extremity Vascular Injury.Am Surg. 2025 Jul;91(7):1108-1112. doi: 10.1177/00031348241244629. Epub 2024 Apr 8. Am Surg. 2025. PMID: 38590003
-
Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD011757. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011757.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29390170 Free PMC article.
-
Compartment syndrome of the thigh: a systematic review.Injury. 2010 Feb;41(2):133-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.03.016. Epub 2009 Jun 24. Injury. 2010. PMID: 19555950
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials