Comparison of Thulium Fiber Laser versus Holmium laser in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a Meta-analysis and systematic review
- PMID: 38374098
- PMCID: PMC10875760
- DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01419-6
Comparison of Thulium Fiber Laser versus Holmium laser in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a Meta-analysis and systematic review
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of thulium fiber laser (TFL) to holmium: YAG (Ho: YAG) laser in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for urolithiasis.
Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CENTRAL, SinoMed, CNKI database, VIP and Wanfang Database were systematically searched for all relevant clinical trials until September 2023. References were explored to identify the relevant articles. Meta-analysis was carried out for the retrieved studies using RevMan5.4.1 software, and the risk ratio, mean difference and 95% confidence interval were expressed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The main outcomes of this meta-analysis were stone-free rate (SFR), perioperative outcomes and intraoperative or postoperative complications.
Results: Thirteen studies, including 1394 patients, were included. According to the results of pooled analysis, TFL was associated with significantly higher stone-free rate (SFR) [0.52, 95% CI (0.32, 0.85), P = 0.009], shorter operation time [-5.47, 95% CI (-8.86, -2.08), P = 0.002], and less stone migration [0.17, 95% CI (0.06, 0.50), P = 0.001]. However, there was no significant difference in terms of the laser time, duration of hospital stay, drop of hemoglobin level, total energy, postoperative ureteral stenting, the incidence of intraoperative complications or postoperative complications between TFL and Ho: YAGs.
Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrated several advantages of TFL in terms of higher SFR, shorter operative time and less stone migration.
Trial registration: The protocol of this systematic review was listed in PROSPERO ( www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ) (Protocol number: CRD42022362550).
Keywords: Ho:YAG; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Thulium fiber laser; Ureteroscopic lithotripsy; Urolithiasis.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of thulium fiber laser versus holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser in lithotripsy for urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Urolithiasis. 2025 Feb 15;53(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01709-0. Urolithiasis. 2025. PMID: 39954083
-
Thulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet for Lithotripsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol. 2024 Jun;85(6):529-540. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.011. Epub 2024 Jan 29. Eur Urol. 2024. PMID: 38290963
-
Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial.Eur Urol. 2022 Jul;82(1):73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027. Epub 2022 Mar 14. Eur Urol. 2022. PMID: 35300888 Clinical Trial.
-
Thulium fibre laser vs holmium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis: meta-analysis of clinical studies.BJU Int. 2023 Apr;131(4):383-394. doi: 10.1111/bju.15921. Epub 2022 Nov 23. BJU Int. 2023. PMID: 36260370 Review.
-
Clinical efficacy and safety of the superpulse thulium fiber laser and holmium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi: a randomized, positive control, blinded, single-center clinical study {1}.Trials. 2024 Nov 25;25(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08362-9. Trials. 2024. PMID: 39587620 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Temperature variations with Ho: YAG and thulium fiber lasers, including advanced fragmentation pulse (AFP) technology: an experimental analysis.World J Urol. 2025 May 16;43(1):309. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05675-5. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40377701
-
Comparing thulium fiber versus high power holmium laser in bilateral same sitting retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones: Results from a multicenter study.Investig Clin Urol. 2024 Sep;65(5):451-458. doi: 10.4111/icu.20240185. Investig Clin Urol. 2024. PMID: 39249917 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of holmium: YAG laser vs. Thulium fiber laser for ureteric stones during ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy - a prospective, randomized single-centre study.World J Urol. 2025 Mar 12;43(1):167. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05568-7. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40074876 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of 6. 3Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope versus 7. 5Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones < 1. 5 cm: a randomized controlled trial.World J Urol. 2025 Jun 23;43(1):384. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05751-w. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40549155 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of thulium fiber laser versus holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser in lithotripsy for urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Urolithiasis. 2025 Feb 15;53(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01709-0. Urolithiasis. 2025. PMID: 39954083
References
-
- Zeng G, Zhao Z, Mazzon G, Pearle M, Choong S, Skolarikos A, et al. European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis and International Alliance of Urolithiasis Joint Consensus on Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Management of Renal Stones. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;S2405-4569:00290-X. - PubMed
-
- Martov AG, Ergakov DV, Guseinov MA, Andronov AS, Dutov SV, Vinnichenko VA, et al. Initial experience in clinical application of thulium laser contact lithotripsy for transurethral treatment of urolithiasis. Urologiia. 2018;1:112–20. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources