Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;38(6):802-810.
doi: 10.1177/02692155241231929. Epub 2024 Feb 19.

Towards a core outcome set for dysarthria after stroke: What should we measure?

Claire Mitchell  1 , Kate Woodward-Nutt  2 , Annette Dancer  3 , Stephen Taylor  3 , Joe Bugler  3 , Audrey Bowen  4 , Paul Conroy  5 , Brooke-Mai Whelan  6 , Sarah J Wallace  6   7   8 , Sabrina El Kouaissi  1 , Jamie Kirkham  9
Affiliations

Towards a core outcome set for dysarthria after stroke: What should we measure?

Claire Mitchell et al. Clin Rehabil. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To identify and agree on what outcome domains should be measured in research and clinical practice when working with stroke survivors who have dysarthria.

Design: Delphi process, two rounds of an online survey followed by two online consensus meetings.

Setting: UK and Australia.

Participants: Stroke survivors with experience of dysarthria, speech and language therapists/pathologists working in stroke and communication researchers.

Methods: Initial list of outcome domains generated from existing literature and with our patient and public involvement group to develop the survey. Participants completed two rounds of this survey to rate importance. Outcomes were identified as 'in', 'unclear' or 'out' from the second survey. All participants were invited to two consensus meetings to discuss these results followed by voting to identify critically important outcome domains for a future Core Outcome Set. All outcomes were voted on in the consensus meetings and included if 70% of meeting participants voted 'yes' for critically important.

Results: In total, 148 surveys were fully completed, and 28 participants attended the consensus meetings. A core outcome set for dysarthria after stroke should include four outcome domains: (a) intelligibility of speech, (b) ability to participate in conversations, (c) living well with dysarthria, (d) skills and knowledge of communication partners (where relevant).

Conclusions: We describe the consensus of 'what' speech outcomes after stroke are valued by all stakeholders including those with lived experience. We share these findings to encourage the measurement of these domains in clinical practice and research and for future research to identify 'how' best to measure these outcomes.

Keywords: Dysarthria; outcome assessment (health care); rehabilitation; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Darley FL, Aronson AE, Brown JR. Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria. J Speech Hear Res 1969; 12: 246–269. - PubMed
    1. Mitchell C, Gittins M, Tyson S, et al. Prevalence of aphasia and dysarthria among inpatient stroke survivors: describing the population, therapy provision and outcomes on discharge. Aphasiology 2021; 35: 950–960.
    1. Brady MC, Clark AM, Dickson S, et al. The impact of stroke-related dysarthria on social participation and implications for rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33: 178–186. - PubMed
    1. Mitchell C, Bowen A, Tyson S, et al. Interventions for dysarthria due to stroke and other adult-acquired, non-progressive brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 1: CD002088. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 2009; 374: 86–89. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources