Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 5:15:1298409.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1298409. eCollection 2024.

Comparison of remimazolam and propofol combined with low dose esketamine for pediatric same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy: a randomized, controlled clinical trial

Affiliations

Comparison of remimazolam and propofol combined with low dose esketamine for pediatric same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy: a randomized, controlled clinical trial

Tiantian Chu et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Background: Remimazolam has shown similar or even superior properties to propofol in procedural sedation in adults, but few studies have been conducted in pediatric populations. Thus, we aimed to compare the effect and safety of remimazolam and propofol combined with low dose esketamine for pediatric same-day bidirectional endoscopy (BDE). Methods: Pediatrics <18 years scheduled for elective BDE under sedation were included and randomly assigned to remimazolam group (R group) or propofol group (P group). The primary outcome was the success rate of sedation. Secondary outcomes include sedation-related information and adverse events. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and perfusion index (PI) were recorded during sedation. Results: A total of 106 patients were enrolled and analyzed. The success rate of sedation was 100% in both groups. Compared with the P group, the induction time of the R group was significantly prolonged (p < 0.001), and the incidence of injection pain, intraoperative respiratory depression, hypotension and bradycardia was significantly lower (p < 0.001). The changes in MAP, HR and PI were relatively stable in the R group compared with the P group. Additionally, awake time significantly decreased with age by approximately 1.12 index points for each increase in age in the P group (p = 0.002) but not in the R group (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the decline in PI and PI ratio during BDE was related to body movement in the P group. Conclusion: Remimazolam combined with low dose esketamine has a non-inferior sedative effect than propofol for pediatric BDE, with no injection pain, less respiratory depression, more stable hemodynamics. Moreover, early detection of the decline in PI may avoid harmful stimulation under light anesthesia. Clinical trial registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05686863?id=NCT05686863&rank=1, NCT05686863.

Keywords: bidirectional endoscopy; esketamine; pediatric; propofol; remimazolam; sedation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of included participants.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Scatter plots for awake time and (A) age, (B) sex, (C) BMI, (D) sleep index, (E) anethesia time, and (F) Dose of remimazolam under remimazolam anesthesia. BMI, body mass index.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Linear regression for awake time and (A) age under propofol anesthesia. Scatter plots for awake time and (B) sex, (C) BMI, (D) sleep index, (E) anethesia time, and (F) Dose of propofol under propofol anesthesia. BMI, body mass index.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Changes in (A) MAP, (B) HR, and (C) PI across different study time points. MAP, Mean arterial pressure; HR, Heart rate; PI, perfusion index. Before anesthesia induction (T0; baseline); 5 min after induction (T1); 10 min after induction (T2); 15 min after induction (T3); endoscopy examination ended (T4). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.001 compared with baseline (T0), # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.001 compared with P group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Borkett K. M., Riff D. S., Schwartz H. I., Winkle P. J., Pambianco D. J., Lees J. P., et al. (2015). A Phase IIa, randomized, double-blind study of remimazolam (CNS 7056) versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Anesth. Analg. 120 (4), 771–780. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000548 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Canpolat D. G., Yildirim M. D., Aksu R., Kutuk N., Alkan A., Cantekin K. (2016). Intravenous ketamine, propofol and propofol-ketamine combination used for pediatric dental sedation: a randomized clinical study. Pak J. Med. Sci. 32 (3), 682–687. 10.12669/pjms.323.9834 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen S., Wang J., Xu X., Huang Y., Xue S., Wu A., et al. (2020). The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate versus propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: a multicentered, randomized, positive-controlled, phase III clinical trial. Am. J. Transl. Res. 12 (8), 4594–4603. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen S. H., Yuan T. M., Zhang J., Bai H., Tian M., Pan C. X., et al. (2021). Remimazolam tosilate in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, phase III trial. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 36 (2), 474–481. 10.1111/jgh.15188 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen S. L., Zhu X., Zhao J. F., Zhai X. Q., Li J., Chang P. A. (2022). The effect of esketamine on peri-examination stress response in patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy. China&Foreign Med. Treat. 41 (14), 14–18. 10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742.2022.14.014 - DOI

Associated data