Gender stereotypes in preschoolers' mental rotation
- PMID: 38375117
- PMCID: PMC10875053
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1284314
Gender stereotypes in preschoolers' mental rotation
Abstract
The investigation of gender stereotypes constitutes a relevant approach to understanding the development of spatial ability and sex differences in the domain. This was the first study concerned with the presence of implicit and explicit gender stereotypes about spatial ability, and their potential relation to spatial task performance, in preschool-aged children. Our full sample consisted of 138 4- to 6-year-old kindergarten children. The experimental procedure consisted of three parts. Children completed an implicit association task, a short questionnaire on explicit stereotypes, and a chronometric mental rotation task. Preschool-aged children held explicit gender stereotypes about spatial ability linking it to boys rather than girls. Boys exhibited stronger stereotypes in this regard than girls. We also found evidence for the presence of implicit stereotypes. However, implicit stereotypes were not found in sub-group analyses. No clear relationship between stereotypes and mental rotation performance emerged, but our results suggest that implicit stereotyping affected mental rotation accuracy differently in girls compared with boys. Our main conclusion was that children already hold stereotypic beliefs about spatial ability at preschool age. There did not seem to be a relationship of stereotyping with spatial ability at this age.
Keywords: children; gender stereotypes; human sex differences; kindergarten; mental rotation; preschool; spatial ability.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Figures
 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                References
- 
    - Bates D. M., Mächler M., Bolker B. M., Walker S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using Lme 4. J. Stat. Softw. 67:1. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
 
- 
    - Bluemke M., Friese M. (2008). Reliability and validity of the single-target IAT (ST-IAT): assessing automatic affect towards multiple attitude objects. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 38, 977–997. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.487 - DOI
 
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
 
        