Proposal of the novel predictive model for postoperative pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic tumor based on preoperative imaging parameters and stapler handling
- PMID: 38375966
- DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12113
Proposal of the novel predictive model for postoperative pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic tumor based on preoperative imaging parameters and stapler handling
Abstract
Background: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) using linear staplers is widely performed; however, postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) remain an issue. This study aimed to analyze preoperative risk factors for POPF and assess stapler handling.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent DP for pancreatic tumors using a linear stapler between 2014 and 2022. Preoperative measurements included pancreas-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (SIR) on fat-suppressed T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The main outcome was clinically relevant POPF of the 2016 International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistulas definition. The predictive ability of the model was compared with the distal fistula risk score (D-FRS) by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Results: Among the 81 patients, POPF occurred in 31 (38.2%). Multivariate analysis identified computed tomography-measured pancreatic thickness (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.61, p = 0.009) and SIR on T1-weighted MRI (OR 6.85, 95% CI 1.71-27.4, p = 0.002) as preoperative predictors. A novel preoperative model, "Thickness × MRI (TM)"-index, was established by multiplying these two variables. The TM-index exhibited the highest predictability preoperatively (AUROC 0.757, 95% CI 0.649-0.867). In the intraoperative variable analyses, TM-index (p < 0.001), thin cartridge application (p = 0.032), and short pre-firing compression (p = 0.047) were identified as significant risk factors for POPF. The model's AUROC combined with these two stapler handling methods was higher than D-FRS (0.851 vs. 0.660, p = 0.006).
Conclusions: The novel preoperative model exhibited excellent predictability. Thick cartridge use and long pre-firing compression were protective factors against POPF. This model may facilitate preventive surgical strategy development to reduce POPF.
Keywords: distal pancreatectomy; linear stapler; pancreatic fistula; predictive model.
© 2024 International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie (ISS/SIC).
Similar articles
-
The pancreas-to-muscle signal intensity ratio on T1-weighted MRI as a predictive biomarker for postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a single-center retrospective study.World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Aug 5;20(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02718-8. World J Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35932021 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of pre-firing compression on the prevention of pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy.Am J Surg. 2018 Sep;216(3):506-510. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Mar 26. Am J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29606277
-
Efficacy of Reinforced Stapler for Preventing Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy.Anticancer Res. 2024 Aug;44(8):3655-3661. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.17189. Anticancer Res. 2024. PMID: 39060077
-
Attempts to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy.Surg Today. 2017 Apr;47(4):416-424. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1367-8. Epub 2016 Jun 20. Surg Today. 2017. PMID: 27324393 Review.
-
Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery.World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 28;25(28):3722-3737. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3722. World J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31391768 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Chong, E., B. Ratnayake, S. Lee, J. J. French, C. Wilson, K. J. Roberts, B. P. T. Loveday, et al. 2021. “Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Risk Factors of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Distal Pancreatectomy in the Era of 2016 International Study Group Pancreatic Fistula Definition.” HPB (Oxford) 23(8): 1139–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2021.02.015.
-
- Diener, M. K., C. M. Seiler, I. Rossion, J. Kleeff, M. Glanemann, G. Butturini, A. Tomazic, et al. 2011. “Efficacy of Stapler Versus Hand‐Sewn Closure after Distal Pancreatectomy (DISPACT): A Randomised, Controlled Multicentre Trial.” Lancet 377(9776): 1514–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140‐6736(11)60237‐7.
-
- De Pastena, M., E. A. van Bodegraven, T. H. Mungroop, F. L. Vissers, L. R. Jones, G. Marchegiani, A. Balduzzi, et al. 2022. “Distal Pancreatectomy Fistula Risk Score (D‐FRS): Development and International Validation.” Annals of Surgery 277(5): e1099–e1105. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005497.
-
- Kawaida, H., H. Kono, M. Watanabe, N. Hosomura, H. Amemiya, and H. Fujii. 2018. “Risk Factors of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Distal Pancreatectomy Using a Triple‐Row Stapler.” Surgery Today 48(1): 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595‐017‐1554‐2.
-
- Nassour, I., S. AlMasri, J. C. Hodges, S. J. Hughes, A. Zureikat, and A. Paniccia. 2022. “Novel Calculator to Estimate the Risk of Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Distal Pancreatectomy.” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 26(7): 1436–1444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605‐022‐05275‐3.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical