Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Apr 3;68(4):e0119723.
doi: 10.1128/aac.01197-23. Epub 2024 Feb 20.

A population pharmacokinetic model for posaconazole intravenous solution and oral powder for suspension formulations in pediatric patients with neutropenia

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A population pharmacokinetic model for posaconazole intravenous solution and oral powder for suspension formulations in pediatric patients with neutropenia

Gregory Winchell et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

The objective of this study was to support posaconazole dose regimens in pediatric patients aged ≥2 years, using a population pharmacokinetic (PK) approach with data from a phase 1b study (NCT02452034). A one-compartment model with first-order absorption was fit to pharmacokinetic data from 144 participants aged 2 to 17 years, who were administered posaconazole as intravenous (IV) and powder for oral suspension (PFS) formulations, or IV only, at dosing regimens of 3.5, 4.5, and 6 mg/kg. The influence of demographic and clinical factors on pharmacokinetic parameters was evaluated using a stepwise forward inclusion/backward exclusion procedure. The final model simulated posaconazole exposure in patients aged 2 to <7 and 7 to 17 years at dosing regimens of 4.5, 6, and 7.5 mg/kg. Plasma concentration data following IV and PFS administration were well-described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and estimated bioavailability, where clearance and volume were subject to allometric scaling by body weight. The 6-mg/kg dosing regimen achieved the pharmacokinetic target (90% of the pediatric population having an average steady-state plasma concentration of ≥500 and <2,000 ng/mL) for both age groups, regardless of whether patients received IV and PFS or IV only. In a virtual adolescent population (body weight >40 kg), the 300 mg/day posaconazole tablet was also predicted to achieve the pharmacokinetic target and remain within a safe range of exposure. These data informed a weight-based nomogram for PFS dosing to maximize the number of pediatric patients achieving the pharmacokinetic target across weight bands, while also maintaining a favorable benefit/risk profile.

Keywords: antifungal agents; invasive fungal disease; pediatrics; pharmacokinetics; posaconazole.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

R.W., E.M., C.B., and H.W. are current or former employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, and may own stock and/or options in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. R.G. owns stock and/or options in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. A.O., R.G., and G.W. received consulting fees paid to Certara by Merck for contribution. A.O., R.G., F.F., G.W., R.W., C.B., E.M., and H.W. have no conflicts to report.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Correlation of interindividual variability with the relative bioavailability of the posaconazole PFS formulation vs two-category food effect covariates. Graphical assessments of the IIV of the posaconazole PFS formulation for (a) the overall food effect parameter, (b) food intake within 2 hours before dosing, and (c) food intake within 1 hour post-dose. N represents the number of observations with certain associated food information. The line in the box represents median, boxes extend to the 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers extend to the 5th and 95th percentiles. F1, relative bioavailability; IIV, interindividual variability; PFS, powder for oral suspension; POS, posaconazole.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Goodness-of-fit analysis for the final structural pharmacokinetic model. Goodness-of-fit plots for (a) log of observed posaconazole concentrations (ng/mL) vs the log of individual predicted posaconazole concentrations (ng/mL), (b) log of observed posaconazole concentrations (ng/mL) vs the log of population predicted posaconazole concentrations (ng/mL), (c) frequency of individual conditional weighted residuals, and (d) conditional weight residuals vs the log of population-predicted posaconazole concentrations (ng/mL). Excludes outlier observations. In (a), (b), and (d), dots represent individual data and solid gray lines represent trend lines. In (a) and (b), the black dashed lines are lines of identity. In (d), the black dashed line represents a reference (zero) line.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Distribution of simulated Cavg per age group and formulation. Distribution of simulated posaconazole Cavg per age group (2 to <7 or 7 to 17 years) and formulation (IV or PFS) at (a) 4.5, (b) 6, (c) and 7.5 mg/kg. The vertical dashed line is the geometric mean of the pharmacokinetic parameter. The left and right solid lines represent the thresholds of 500 and 2,500 ng/mL, respectively. Cavg, average steady-state plasma concentration; IV, intravenous; PFS, powder for oral suspension.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Distribution of model-predicted Cavg by body weight for posaconazole tablets and PFS in virtual pediatric subjects and observed distribution of Cavg for posaconazole tablets in adults. Frequency distribution of model-predicted Cavg by body weight for the 300 mg QD posaconazole tablet and the 6-mg/kg QD PFS dosing schedule in virtual pediatric patients vs the distribution of Cavg for the 300 mg QD posaconazole tablet observed in adults from a previous study (14), across 28 days of dosing. The line in the box represents the median, boxes extend to the 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers extend to the 5th and 95th percentiles. The dashed line represents the 500 ng/mL posaconazole Cavg target concentration. Cavg, average steady-state plasma concentration; IV, intravenous; PFS, powder for oral suspension; QD, once daily.

References

    1. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, Pappas PG, Maertens J, Lortholary O, Kauffman CA, et al. . 2008. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European organization for research and treatment of cancer/invasive fungal infections cooperative group and the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases mycoses study group (EORTC/MSG) consensus group. Clin Infect Dis 46:1813–1821. doi:10.1086/588660 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akan H. 2005. Management of invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients. Hematology 10 Suppl 1:234–237. doi:10.1080/10245330512331390023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castagnola E, Cesaro S, Giacchino M, Livadiotti S, Tucci F, Zanazzo G, Caselli D, Caviglia I, Parodi S, Rondelli R, Cornelli PE, Mura R, Santoro N, Russo G, De Santis R, Buffardi S, Viscoli C, Haupt R, Rossi MR. 2006. Fungal infections in children with cancer: a prospective, multicenter surveillance study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 25:634–639. doi:10.1097/01.inf.0000220256.69385.2e - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hovi L, Saarinen-Pihkala UM, Vettenranta K, Saxen H. 2000. Invasive fungal infections in pediatric bone marrow transplant recipients: single center experience of 10 years. Bone Marrow Transplant 26:999–1004. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1702654 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dvorak CC, Steinbach WJ, Brown JMY, Agarwal R. 2005. Risks and outcomes of invasive fungal infections in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 36:621–629. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1705113 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources