Second sensor to improve near-infrared spectroscopy flap monitor utility: A prospective study
- PMID: 38376250
- DOI: 10.1002/micr.31142
Second sensor to improve near-infrared spectroscopy flap monitor utility: A prospective study
Abstract
Objective: This study assesses whether use of continuous noninvasive near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) sensor on head and neck free flap (FF) with a second sensor on nonoperated tissue improves distinction between systemic hypoperfusion and FF compromise.
Methods: Single-institution, prospective study of patients undergoing head and neck FF reconstruction from December 2018 to April 2020. FFs were continuously monitored using NIRS on a monitor paddle with a second (control) sensor on the shoulder. Crude StO2 and percent change in StO2 were compared between the FF and control sensors on each patient, and percent change and percent difference between the control and the monitor paddle were documented to assess for congruity. Sentinel events (e.g., hypotension and hematoma) were documented to assess the association with change in StO2. These events and timing of StO2 changes were noted to assess associations with change in StO2.
Results: A total of 48 patients had complete data. Donor sites included 35 soft-tissue FFs and 13 fibula FFs. Average StO2 was 73.7 ± 5.5 for FFs and 71.4 ± 5.0 for control sensors. There were seven sentinel events during the study. At the time of the events, StO2 dropped significantly more for the FF than the control sensor (FF = 52.2% drop; control = 6.2% drop; p = .016). NIRS signal denoted change prior to changes in implantable arterial Doppler in all cases.
Conclusions: The addition of a second sensor when using NIRS as a primary modality for FF monitoring may improve distinction between FF compromise events and systemic hypoperfusion. By increasing accuracy of the monitor, there is a potential for decreased resident burden and decreased use of higher level of care nursing, which could reduce overall costs.
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Arshad, H., Ozer, H. G., Thatcher, A., Old, M., Ozer, E., Agarwal, A., Jafari, H., Birkheimer, D., Basinger, H., Forest, L. A., Schuller, D. E., & Teknos, T. N. (2014). Intensive care unit versus non-intensive care unit postoperative management of head and neck free flaps: Comparative effectiveness and cost comparisons. Head & Neck, 36(4), 536-539.
-
- Cannady, S. B., Hatten, K., & Wax, M. K. (2016). Postoperative controversies in the management of free flap surgery in the head and neck. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America, 24(3), 309-314.
-
- Cornejo, A., Ivatury, S., Crane, C. N., Myers, J. G., & Wang, H. T. (2013). Analysis of free flap complications and utilization of intensive care unit monitoring. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, 29(7), 473-479. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1345434
-
- Fleming, I., Giladi, A. M., Means, K. R., Jr., Colon, A. F., & The Curtis National Hand Center The Use of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Identify Digital Ischemia in Varying Skin Pigmentation Types. Poster presented 2020 AAHNS meeting.Baltimore, MD.
-
- Huber, W., Zanner, R., Schneider, G., Schmid, R., & Lahmer, T. (2019). Assessment of regional perfusion and organ function: Less and non-invasive techniques. Front Med (Lausanne), 22(6), 50. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00050
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous