Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;202(2):139-150.
doi: 10.1007/s00408-024-00673-7. Epub 2024 Feb 20.

Identification of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Prediction of Disease Severity via Machine Learning Analysis of Comprehensive Metabolic Panel and Complete Blood Count Data

Affiliations

Identification of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Prediction of Disease Severity via Machine Learning Analysis of Comprehensive Metabolic Panel and Complete Blood Count Data

Alex N Mueller et al. Lung. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) typically relies on high-resolution computed tomography imaging (HRCT) or histopathology, while monitoring disease severity is done via frequent pulmonary function testing (PFT). More reliable and convenient methods of diagnosing fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) type and monitoring severity would allow for early identification and enhance current therapeutic interventions. This study tested the hypothesis that a machine learning (ML) ensemble analysis of comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) and complete blood count (CBC) data can accurately distinguish IPF from connective tissue disease ILD (CTD-ILD) and predict disease severity as seen with PFT.

Methods: Outpatient data with diagnosis of IPF or CTD-ILD (n = 103 visits by 53 patients) were analyzed via ML methodology to evaluate (1) IPF vs CTD-ILD diagnosis; (2) %predicted Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) moderate or mild vs severe; (3) %predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) moderate or mild vs severe; and (4) %predicted FVC mild vs moderate or severe.

Results: ML methodology identified IPF from CTD-ILD with AUCTEST = 0.893, while PFT was classified as DLCO moderate or mild vs severe with AUCTEST = 0.749, FVC moderate or mild vs severe with AUCTEST = 0.741, and FVC mild vs moderate or severe with AUCTEST = 0.739. Key features included albumin, alanine transaminase, %lymphocytes, hemoglobin, %eosinophils, white blood cell count, %monocytes, and %neutrophils.

Conclusion: Analysis of CMP and CBC data via proposed ML methodology offers the potential to distinguish IPF from CTD-ILD and predict severity on associated PFT with accuracy that meets or exceeds current clinical practice.

Keywords: Connective tissue disease; Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; Interstitial lung disease; Machine learning; Pulmonary function testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. National Library of Medicine, N.I.H. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/idiopathic-pulmonary-fibrosis . Accessed 30 Aug 2019
    1. Raghu G et al (2011) An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 183(6):788–824 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Blackwell TS et al (2014) Future directions in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis research. An NHLBI workshop report. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 189(2):214–222 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Lederer DJ, Martinez FJ (2018) Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 379(8):797–798 - PubMed
    1. Chung JH et al (2021) Differentiation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis from connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease using quantitative imaging. J Clin Med 10:12 - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources