Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 14:1:100011.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2019.100011. eCollection 2020 Jan.

Whole body vibration elicits differential immune and metabolic responses in obese and normal weight individuals

Affiliations

Whole body vibration elicits differential immune and metabolic responses in obese and normal weight individuals

Anson M Blanks et al. Brain Behav Immun Health. .

Abstract

Traditional aerobic exercise reduces the risk of developing chronic diseases by inducing immune, metabolic, and myokine responses. Following traditional exercise, both the magnitude and time-course of these beneficial responses are different between obese compared to normal weight individuals. Although obesity may affect the ability to engage in traditional exercise, whole body vibration (WBV) has emerged as a more tolerable form of exercise . The impact of WBV on immune, metabolic, and myokine responses as well as differences between normal weight and obese individuals, however, is unknown.

Purpose: To determine if WBV elicits differential magnitudes and time-courses of immune, metabolic, and myokine responses between obese and normal weight individuals.

Methods: 21 participants [Obese (OB): n = 11, Age: 33 ± 4 y, percent body fat (%BF): 39.1 ± 2.4% & Normal weight (NW) n = 10, Age: 28 ± 8 y, %BF: 17.4 ± 2.1%] engaged in 10 cycles of WBV exercise [1 cycle = 1 min of vibration followed by 30 s of rest]. Blood samples were collected pre-WBV (PRE), immediately (POST), 3 h (3H), and 24 h (24H) post-WBV and analyzed for leukocytes, insulin, glucose, and myokines (IL-6, decorin, myostatin).

Results: The peak (3H) percent change in neutrophil counts (OB: 13.9 ± 17.4 vs. NW: 47.2 ± 6.2%Δ; p = 0.007) was different between groups. The percent change in neutrophil percentages was increased in NW (POST: -1.6 ± 2.0 vs. 3H: 13.0 ± 7.2%Δ, p = 0.019) but not OB (p > 0.05). HOMA β-cell function was increased at 24H (PRE: 83.4 ± 5.4 vs. 24H: 131.0 ± 14.1%; p = 0.013) in NW and was not altered in OB (p > 0.05). PRE IL-6 was greater in OB compared to NW (OB: 2.7 ± 0.6 vs. NW: 0.6 ± 0.1 pg/mL; p = 0.011); however, the percent change from PRE to peak (3H) was greater in NW (OB: 148.1 ± 47.9 vs. NW: 1277.9 ± 597.6 %Δ; p = 0.035). Creatine kinase, decorin, and myostatin were not significantly altered in either group (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Taken together, these data suggest that acute whole body vibration elicits favorable immune, metabolic, and myokine responses and that these responses differ between obese and normal weight individuals.

Keywords: Glucose; Leukocytes; Myokines; Whole body vibration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percent change from baseline (PRE) in neutrophil percentages (A) and neutrophil counts (B) as well as lymphocyte percentages (C) and lymphocyte counts (D) in normal weight (NW) and obese (OB). *p ​< ​0.05 between groups, †p ​< ​0.05 vs. PRE within NW group, ‡p ​< ​0.05 vs. 3H within NW group; 2 ​× ​4 factorial ANCOVA.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Time-course of glucose (A) and insulin (B) responses for normal weight (NW) and obese (OB) participants. *p ​< ​0.05 between groups, **p ​< ​0.05 vs. all time points within NW group; †p ​< ​0.05 PRE vs. POST within OB group, ‡p ​< ​0.05 vs. 3H within OB group; 2 ​× ​4 factorial ANCOVA.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percent change of IL-6 from pre-WBV for normal weight (NW) and obese (OB) individuals in response to whole body vibration. *p ​< ​0.05 between groups, ‡p ​< ​0.05 vs. 3H within NW group; 2 ​× ​4 factorial ANCOVA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beavers K.M., Brinkley T.E., Nicklas B.J. Effect of exercise training on chronic inflammation. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2010;411(11–12):785–793. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benjamin E.J., Virani S.S., Callaway C.W. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2018;137(12):e67–e492. - PubMed
    1. Benschop R.J., Rodriguez-Feuerhahn M., Schedlowski M. Catecholamine-induced leukocytosis: early observations, current research, and future directions. Brain Behav. Immun. 1996;10(2):77–91. - PubMed
    1. Bish C.L., Blanck H.M., Maynard L.M., Serdula M.K., Thompson N.J., Khan L.K. Activity/participation limitation and weight loss among overweight and obese US adults: 1999 to 2002 NHANES. MedGenMed. 2007;9(3):63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cardinale M., Wakeling J. Whole body vibration exercise: are vibrations good for you? Br. J. Sports Med. 2005;39(9):585–589. discussion 589. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources