Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun:157:108669.
doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2024.108669. Epub 2024 Feb 15.

Electro-antibacterial therapy (EAT) to enhance intracellular bacteria clearance in pancreatic cancer cells

Affiliations

Electro-antibacterial therapy (EAT) to enhance intracellular bacteria clearance in pancreatic cancer cells

Josie L Duncan et al. Bioelectrochemistry. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Intratumoral bacteria have been implicated in driving tumor progression, yet effective treatments to modulate the tumor microbiome remain limited. In this study, we investigate the use of electroporation in combination with metronidazole to enhance the clearance of intracellular Fusobacterium nucleatum within pancreatic cancer cells. We explore various parameters, including electric field strength, pulse width, and pulse number to assess the permeability of pancreatic cancer cells infected with F. nucleatum, compared to non-infected cells of the same type. We subsequently quantify the clearance of intracellular bacteria when these pulsing schemes are applied to a suspension of infected pancreatic cancer cells in the presence of metronidazole. Our results reveal distinct differences in cell permeability between infected and non-infected cells, identifying a unique biophysical marker for host cells infected with F. nucleatum. We demonstrate that the combinatorial use of electroporation and metronidazole significantly enhances the delivery of metronidazole into host cells, leading to more effective clearance of intracellular F. nucleatum compared to independent treatments; we term this novel approach Electro-Antibacterial Therapy (EAT). EAT holds promise as an innovative strategy for addressing intratumoral bacteria in pancreatic cancer, other malignancies, and potentially treatment-resistant infections, offering new avenues for therapeutic intervention.

Keywords: Antibiotic; Bacteria; Electroporation; Fusobacterium; Pulsed Electric Fields; Tumor Microbiome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The authors have a pending patent on the concept described in this article. Rafael V. Davalos has ownership interest for startup companies within the field of bioelectrics. In addition, Davalos also receives royalty income from technologies he has invented.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
An overview of a) bacterial culture, b) cell infection, and c) pulsing treatment protocols. d) Representative images of agar plates 72 hr after treatment provide qualitative evidence for the efficacy of the control, independent, and combinatorial treatments. The ROI used in ImageJ is indicated here to quantify colony forming units.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
a) Percentage of the sample uptaking propidium iodide for applied field strength with 10 ms pulses, ECT, and IRE. Non-infected cells appear to be more susceptible to the field than infected cells. b) Maximum permeability and cell death occur for both infected and non-infected cells at 450 V/cm.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Electro-Antibacterial Therapy is an effective method for inactivating intracellular tumor-associated F. nucleatum. The quantified normalized intracellular bacteria viability due to a) IRE with or without MTZ (5 μg/mL) (N = 2, n = 6) is moderately effective at reducing bacteria viability. EAT 10 ms pulses delivered at b) 300 V/cm (N = 3, n = 9) and c) 450 V/cm (N = 2, n = 6) result in a decrease in intracellular bacteria viability with applied field or antibiotic alone, but result in maximum clearance of intracellular bacteria when used in synergy. The colony forming units quantified here are bacteria that were intracellular at the time of treatment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, and Bray F, “Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 71, pp. 209–249, 5 2021. - PubMed
    1. Baghban R, Roshangar L, Jahanban-Esfahlan R, Seidi K, Ebrahimi-Kalan A, Jaymand M, Kolahian S, Javaheri T, and Zare P, “Tumor microenvironment complexity and therapeutic implications at a glance,” Cell Communication and Signaling, vol. 18, p. 59, 12 2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D, “Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 12, pp. 31–46, 1 2022. - PubMed
    1. Yang L, Li A, Wang Y, and Zhang Y, “Intratumoral microbiota: roles in cancer initiation, development and therapeutic efficacy,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, vol. 8, p. 35, 1 2023. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casasanta MA, Yoo CC, Udayasuryan B, Sanders BE, Umaña A, Zhang Y, Peng H, Duncan AJ, Wang Y, Li L, Verbridge SS, and Slade DJ, “Fusobacterium nucleatum host-cell binding and invasion induces IL-8 and CXCL1 secretion that drives colorectal cancer cell migration,” Science Signaling, vol. 13, p. 9157, 7 2020. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources