Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 20;24(1):133.
doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-02978-4.

Evaluation of whether there is residual polyp tissue after hysteroscopic morcellation at Cam and Sakura City Hospital: a retrospective cohort study

Affiliations

Evaluation of whether there is residual polyp tissue after hysteroscopic morcellation at Cam and Sakura City Hospital: a retrospective cohort study

Mustafa Can Sivas et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: In polypectomy with mechanical hysteroscopic morcellators, the tissue removal procedure continues until no polyp tissue remains. The decision that the polypoid tissues were removed completely is made based on visual evaluation. In a situation where the polyp tissue was visually completely removed and no doubt that the polyp has been completely removed, short spindle-like tissue fragments on the polyp floor continue in most patients. There are no studies in the literature on whether visual evaluation provides adequate information at the cellular level in many patients in whom polypoid tissues have been determined to be completely removed. The aim of the present study was to analyze the pathological results of the curettage procedure, which was applied following the completion of polyp removal with operative hysteroscopy, and to evaluate whether there was residual polyp tissue in the short spindle-like tissue fragments that the mechanical hysteroscopic morcellator could not remove. The secondary aims of this study were to compare conventional loop resection hysteroscopy with hysteroscopic morcellation for the removal of endometrial polyps in terms of hemoglobin/hematocrit changes, polypectomy time and the amount of medium deficit.

Methods: A total of 70 patients with a single pedunculate polypoid image of 1.5-2 cm, which was primarily visualized by office hysteroscopy, were included in the study. Patients who had undergone hysteroscopic polypectomy were divided into two groups according to the surgical device used: the morcellator group (n = 35, Group M) and the resectoscope group (n = 35, Group R). The histopathological results of hysteroscopic specimens and curettage materials of patients who had undergone curettage at the end of operative hysteroscopy were evaluated. In addition, the postoperative 24th hour Hb/HCT decrease amounts in percentage, the polypectomy time which was measured from the start of morcellation, and deficit differences were compared between groups.

Results: In total, 7 patients in the morcellator group had residual polyp tissue detected in the full curettage material. The blood loss was lower in the morcellator group than in the resectoscope group (M, R; (-0.07 ± 0.08), (-0,11 ± 0.06), (p < 0.05), respectively). The deficit value of the morcellator group were higher (M, R; (500 ml), (300 ml), (p < 0.05), respectively). The polypectomy time was shorter in the morcellator group (M, R; mean (2.30 min), (4.6 min), (p < 0.05)).

Conclusions: Even if the lesion is completely visibly removed during hysteroscopic morcellation, extra caution should be taken regarding the possibility of residual tissue. There is a need for new studies investigating the presence of residual polyp tissue.

Keywords: Deficit; Endometrial sampling; Hysteroscopy; Morcellation; Polyp; Remnant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ma T, Readman E, Hicks L, Porter J, Cameron M, Ellett L, et al. Is outpatient hysteroscopy the new gold standard? Results from an 11 year prospective observational study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;57(1):74–80. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12560. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berceanu C, Cernea N, Căpitănescu RG, Comănescu AC, Paitici Ş, Rotar IC, et al. Endometrial polyps. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2022 Apr-Jun;63(2):323–34. PMID: 36374138; PMCID: PMC9804076. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mak JN, Imran A, Burnet S. Office hysteroscopy: back to the future! Climacteric. 2020;23(4):350–4. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2020.1750589. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee MM, Matsuzono T. Hysteroscopic intrauterine morcellation of submucosal fibroids: preliminary results in Hong Kong and comparisons with conventional hysteroscopic monopolar loop resection. Hong Kong Med J. 2016;22(1):56–61. doi: 10.12809/hkmj154600. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Franchini M, Ceci O, Casadio P, Carugno J, Giarrè G, Gubbini G, et al. Mechanical hysteroscopic tissue removal or hysteroscopic morcellator: understanding the past to predict the future. A narrative review. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021;13(3):193–201. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.3.026. - DOI - PMC - PubMed