Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 20;24(1):161.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05155-1.

An intelligent grasper to provide real-time force feedback to shorten the learning curve in laparoscopic training

Affiliations

An intelligent grasper to provide real-time force feedback to shorten the learning curve in laparoscopic training

Xuemei Huang et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: A lack of force feedback in laparoscopic surgery often leads to a steep learning curve to the novices and traditional training system equipped with force feedback need a high educational cost. This study aimed to use a laparoscopic grasper providing force feedback in laparoscopic training which can assist in controlling of gripping forces and improve the learning processing of the novices.

Methods: Firstly, we conducted a pre-experiment to verify the role of force feedback in gripping operations and establish the safe gripping force threshold for the tasks. Following this, we proceeded with a four-week training program. Unlike the novices without feedback (Group A2), the novices receiving feedback (Group B2) underwent training that included force feedback. Finally, we completed a follow-up period without providing force feedback to assess the training effect under different conditions. Real-time force parameters were recorded and compared.

Results: In the pre-experiment, we set the gripping force threshold for the tasks based on the experienced surgeons' performance. This is reasonable as the experienced surgeons have obtained adequate skill of handling grasper. The thresholds for task 1, 2, and 3 were set as 0.731 N, 1.203 N and 0.938 N, respectively. With force feedback, the gripping force applied by the novices with feedback (Group B1) was lower than that of the novices without feedback (Group A1) (p < 0.005). During the training period, the Group B2 takes 6 trails to achieve gripping force of 0.635 N, which is lower than the threshold line, whereas the Group A2 needs 11 trails, meaning that the learning curve of Group B2 was significantly shorter than that of Group A2. Additionally, during the follow-up period, there was no significant decline in force learning, and Group B2 demonstrated better control of gripping operations. The training with force feedback received positive evaluations.

Conclusion: Our study shows that using a grasper providing force feedback in laparoscopic training can help to control the gripping force and shorten the learning curve. It is anticipated that the laparoscopic grasper equipped with FBG sensor is promising to provide force feedback during laparoscopic training, which ultimately shows great potential in laparoscopic surgery.

Keywords: Fiber Bragg grating; Force feedback; Laparoscopic training; Learning curve; Minimally invasive surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Instrument connection diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic flowchart of the study protocol
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Box plots of the gripping force among novices for baseline assessment
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(A) and (B) represent the learning curves of maximum force and standard deviation of the gripping force, respectively (SD, standard deviation)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Gripping force at different stages under various conditions. (a) The maximum gripping force of Group C, Group A2 and Group B2 during baseline assessment stage, training stage and follow-up stage, (b) the standard deviation of gripping force of Group C, Group A2 and Group B2 during these three stages

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Othman W, Lai ZA, Abril C, Barajas-Gamboa JS, Corcelles R, Kroh M, et al. Tactile sensing for minimally invasive surgery: conventional methods and potential emerging tactile technologies. Front Robot AI. 2021;8:705662. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.705662. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jung Kim MM, Kim H, Srinivasan MA. Haptics in minimally invasive surgical simulation and training. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2004;24:56–64. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2004.1274062. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Win G, Van Bruwaene S, Allen C, De Ridder D. Design and implementation of a proficiency-based, structured endoscopy course for medical students applying for a surgical specialty. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013;4:103–115. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S41681. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhu R, Marechal M, Suetsugu M, Yamamoto I, Lawn MJ, Matsumoto K, et al. Research and Development of testing device for evaluating force transmission and grasping pressure of laparoscopic forceps. Sensor Mater. 2019;31:4205–4214. doi: 10.18494/SAM.2019.2419. - DOI
    1. Ukai T, Tanaka Y, Fukuda T, Kajikawa T, Miura H, Terada Y. Softness sensing probe with multiple acoustic paths for laparoscopic surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020;15:1537–1547. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02207-x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources