Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 6:15:1308260.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1308260. eCollection 2024.

Prevalence and clinical significance of potential drug-drug interactions among lung transplant patients

Affiliations

Prevalence and clinical significance of potential drug-drug interactions among lung transplant patients

Jiali Zhang et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Background: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are a major but preventable cause of adverse drug reactions. There is insufficient information regarding DDIs in lung transplant recipients. Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of potential DDIs (pDDIs) in intensive care unit (ICU) lung transplant recipients, identify the real DDIs and the most frequently implicated medications in this vulnerable population, and determine the risk factors associated with pDDIs. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included lung transplant recipients from January 2018 to December 2021. Pertinent information was retrieved from medical records. All prescribed medications were screened for pDDIs using the Lexicomp® drug interaction software. According to this interaction software, pDDIs were classified as C, D, or X (C = monitor therapy, D = consider therapy modification, X = avoid combination). The Drug Interaction Probability Scale was used to determine the causation of DDIs. All statistical analysis was performed in SPSS version 26.0. Results: 114 patients were qualified for pDDI analysis, and total pDDIs were 4051. The most common type of pDDIs was category C (3323; 82.0%), followed by D (653; 16.1%) and X (75; 1.9%). Voriconazole and posaconazole were the antifungal medicine with the most genuine DDIs. Mean tacrolimus concentration/dose (Tac C/D) before or after co-therapy was considerably lower than the Tac C/D during voriconazole or posaconazole co-therapy (p < 0.001, p = 0.027). Real DDIs caused adverse drug events (ADEs) in 20 patients. Multivariable logistic regression analyses found the number of drugs per patient (OR, 1.095; 95% CI, 1.048-1.145; p < 0.001) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE Ⅱ) score (OR, 1.097; 95% CI, 1.021-1.179; p = 0.012) as independent risk factors predicting category X pDDIs. Conclusion: This study revealed a high incidence of both potential and real DDIs in ICU lung transplant recipients. Immunosuppressive drugs administered with azole had a high risk of causing clinically significant interactions. The number of co-administered drugs and APACHE Ⅱ score were associated with an increased risk of category × drug interactions. Close monitoring of clinical and laboratory parameters is essential for ensuring successful lung transplantation and preventing adverse drug events associated with DDIs.

Keywords: intensive care unit; lung transplant; potential drug-drug interactions; tacrolimus; voriconazole.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Correlation between the number of drugs prescribed and the number of drugs prescribed and the number of drug-drug interactions detected.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Tacrolimus dose-corrected concentrations over time in patients treated with voriconazole (A) or posaconazole (B). Delta of dose-corrected concentrations (∆C/D) are plotted as a ratio (fold increase) versus the average C/D value before triazole therapy, which is therefore set to 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbas A., Al-Shaibi S., Sankaralingam S., Awaisu A., Kattezhathu V. S., Wongwiwatthananukit S., et al. (2022). Determination of potential drug–drug interactions in prescription orders dispensed in a community pharmacy setting using Micromedex® and Lexicomp®: a retrospective observational study. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 44, 348–356. 10.1007/s11096-021-01346-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adegunsoye A., Strek M. E., Garrity E., Guzy R., Bag R. (2017). Comprehensive care of the lung transplant patient. Chest 152, 150–164. 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alnaim L. S., Almalki H. M., Almutairi A. M., Salamah H. J. (2022). The prevalence of drug–drug interactions in cancer therapy and the clinical outcomes. Life Sci. 310, 121071. 10.1016/j.lfs.2022.121071 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amkreutz J., Koch A., Buendgens L., Muehlfeld A., Trautwein C., Eisert A. (2017). Prevalence and nature of potential drug–drug interactions among kidney transplant patients in a German intensive care unit. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 39, 1128–1139. 10.1007/s11096-017-0525-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Becker M. L., Kallewaard M., Caspers P. W. J., Visser L. E., Hubert G. M., Leufkens B. (2007). Hospitalisations and emergency department visits due to drug-drug interactions: a literature review. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 16, 641–651. 10.1002/pds.1351 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources