Knowledge, perception and acceptability of breastfeeding and bottle feeding among Saudi population
- PMID: 38380408
- PMCID: PMC10876268
- DOI: 10.24911/SJP.106-1665846928
Knowledge, perception and acceptability of breastfeeding and bottle feeding among Saudi population
Abstract
Despite the enormous benefits of breastfeeding (BF), its prevalence is suboptimal, with exclusive BF ranging between 7.3 % and 51% in the Saudi community. The aim of this study was to assess the Saudi community's knowledge regarding BF, exposure to BF promotional messages and formula milk advertisements and acceptability of BF in public places. It was a cross-sectional study that included Saudis aged 20-55 years old between December 2019 and June 2020. It utilised a self-administered questionnaire, which asked about background information, knowledge of BF, exposure to BF-promoting messages and exposure to formula milk advertisements and acceptability of BF versus bottle feeding in public. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS v. 22). For the analysis, a p-value <0.05 was considered significant. The sample included for analysis was 914. The mean age of participants was 33.8 ± 9 years. The majority of participants were female 823 (90%); males 87 (10%). The vast majority (94%) agreed that breast milk is more beneficial than formula milk. Nearly two-thirds (61%) were continuously exposed to messages advertising formula feeding, compared to only 35% who were exposed to messages promoting BF. The study found that 67.2% accept BF in public places. Among male participants, only 49% accepted BF in public places compared to 79% of female participants who accepted it; p-value <0.001. Acceptability of BF in public places was significantly higher among participants who had family members who breastfed (68%), compared to those who did not (50%), (p-value 0.01).
Keywords: Acceptance; Advertisement; Breastfeeding; Formula milk; Knowledge; Perception; Promotion; Public.
Copyright © Sudanese Association of Pediatricians.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Brahm P, Valdés V. Benefits of breastfeeding and risks associated with not breastfeeding. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2017 Feb;88(1):7–14. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0370-41062017000100001. - PubMed
-
- Figueiredo B, Canário C, Field T. Breastfeeding is negatively affected by prenatal depression and reduces postpartum depression. Psychol Med. 2014 Apr;44(5):927–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713001530. - PubMed
-
- Monika A. Zielinska, Hamulka J. Reasons for non-exclusive breast-feeding to infants within the first 6 months. Pediatr Int (Roma) 2018 Mar;60(3):276–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.13480. - PubMed
-
- Khaliq A, Qamar M, Hussaini SA, Azam K, Zehra N, Hussain M, et al. Assessment of knowledge and practices about breastfeeding and weaning among working and non-working mothers. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 Mar;67(3):332–8. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous