Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;20(4):2680-2697.
doi: 10.1002/alz.13729. Epub 2024 Feb 21.

Presenilin-1 mutation position influences amyloidosis, small vessel disease, and dementia with disease stage

Affiliations

Presenilin-1 mutation position influences amyloidosis, small vessel disease, and dementia with disease stage

Nelly Joseph-Mathurin et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Amyloidosis, including cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and markers of small vessel disease (SVD) vary across dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease (DIAD) presenilin-1 (PSEN1) mutation carriers. We investigated how mutation position relative to codon 200 (pre-/postcodon 200) influences these pathologic features and dementia at different stages.

Methods: Individuals from families with known PSEN1 mutations (n = 393) underwent neuroimaging and clinical assessments. We cross-sectionally evaluated regional Pittsburgh compound B-positron emission tomography uptake, magnetic resonance imaging markers of SVD (diffusion tensor imaging-based white matter injury, white matter hyperintensity volumes, and microhemorrhages), and cognition.

Results: Postcodon 200 carriers had lower amyloid burden in all regions but worse markers of SVD and worse Clinical Dementia Rating® scores compared to precodon 200 carriers as a function of estimated years to symptom onset. Markers of SVD partially mediated the mutation position effects on clinical measures.

Discussion: We demonstrated the genotypic variability behind spatiotemporal amyloidosis, SVD, and clinical presentation in DIAD, which may inform patient prognosis and clinical trials.

Highlights: Mutation position influences Aβ burden, SVD, and dementia. PSEN1 pre-200 group had stronger associations between Aβ burden and disease stage. PSEN1 post-200 group had stronger associations between SVD markers and disease stage. PSEN1 post-200 group had worse dementia score than pre-200 in late disease stage. Diffusion tensor imaging-based SVD markers mediated mutation position effects on dementia in the late stage.

Keywords: PSEN1; PiB‐PET; autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD); cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA); codon 200; dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease (DIAD); microbleeds; microhemorrhages; peak width of skeletonized mean diffusivity (PSMD); presenilin‐1; small vessel disease (SVD); white matter hyperintensity (WMH).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

NJM reports receiving a travel fellowship from the Alzheimer's Association to present related work at the Alzheimer Imaging Consortium preconference and the Alzheimer's Association International Conference. CC has received research support from GSK and Eisai Co., Ltd., and acknowledges travel support from Somalogics and consulting fees from Circular Genomics and Alector. CC is a member of the advisory board of Vivid Genetics and Circular Genomics and owns stock in those companies. DMC reports travel support from the Alzheimer's Association. GSD reports consulting fees from Parabon Nanolabs, honoraria from PeerView Media, Continuing Education Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, expert testimony fees from Barrow and from DynaMed, material support from Horizon Therapeutics and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, and owing stock in ANI Pharmaceuticals and Parabon Nanolabs. NCF has provided consultancy or served on advisory or data safety and monitoring boards for F. Hoffmann‐La Roche, Ltd. and Eli Lilly and Company, Ionis, Biogen, and Siemens. WEK is a co‐inventor on a patent portfolio related to PiB PET technology owned by the University of Pittsburgh. GE Healthcare holds a license agreement with the University of Pittsburgh based on the technology described in this manuscript. Dr. Klunk is a co‐inventor of PiB and, as such, has a financial interest in this license agreement. GE Healthcare provided no grant support for this study and had no role in the design or interpretation of results or preparation of this manuscript. WEK has served on the data safety monitoring board for Biogen and owns stock in Cognoptix. JL reports consulting fees and/or honoraria from Eisai Co., Ltd., Biogen, Bayer Vital, TEVA, F. Hoffmann‐La Roche, Ltd., and Zambon, participation on an advisory board for Axon Neuroscience. JMR reports research support from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals. AJS has served on advisory committees for Eisai Co., Ltd., and Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., and has received material from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company. PRS is the company director for Neuroscience Research Australian Foundation (NeuRA), the Health‐Science Alliance, Schizophrenia Research Institute, Australian Association of Medical Research Institutes, Australia Dementia Network Ltd., Standing Pty Ltd., and Australasian Neuroscience Society and acknowledges receiving consulting fees from NeuRA. IY reports consulting fees from ABX‐CRO and Blue Earth Diagnostics, honoraria from Piramal, and travel supports from the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, for both of which he has served on committee. AMB reports consulting fees from Cognition Therapeutics and Regeneron, honoraria from Yale University, Celdara Medical, International Neuropsychological Society, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, International Society for Neurovascular Disease, American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, American Neuropathologists, travel support from the International Neuropsychological Society. AMB has served on an advisory board for the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and CogState and is an editor for Alzheimer's & Dementia. JCM reports consulting fees from Barcelona Brain Research Center (BBRC), Native Alzheimer Disease‐Related Resource Center in Minority Aging Research, and honoraria from Montefiore Grand Rounds and Tetra‐Inst ADRC seminar series, Grand Rounds. JCM has served on advisory and/or study monitoring boards for Cure Alzheimer's Fund, Diverse Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia (VCID) Observational Study and the Longitudinal Early‐Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS). EM is a co‐inventor of a test licensed by C2N Diagnostics and reports honoraria from Eisai Co., Ltd., and the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), travel support from the Alzheimer's Association, Alnylum, Fondation Alzheimer, Amsterdam UMC, and F. Hoffmann‐La Roche, Ltd. EM has served on advisory boards for Eli Lilly and Company, the NIA, Alector, Cumulus Neuroscience Ltd., and SAGE Therapeutics and has leadership involvement in Fondation Alzheimer and Alzamend. CX reports consulting fees from Diadem, participation on the FDA Advisory Committee on Imaging Medical Products, and other financial interests with C2N Diagnostics unrelated to the current study. RJB is the Principal Investigator of the DIAN Observational Study; receives research support from the NIA of the NIH, DIAN‐TU Trial Pharmaceutical Partners, and DIAN‐TU Pharma Consortium; has equity ownership interest in C2N Diagnostics; receives royalty income based on technology licensed by Washington University to C2N Diagnostics; has received honoraria from the Korean Dementia Association, American Neurological Association, Fondazione Prada, Weill Cornell Medical College, and Harvard University, travel support from Alzheimer's Association Roundtable, BrightFocus Foundation, Duke Margolis Alzheimer's Roundtable, Fondazione Prada, F. Hoffmann‐La Roche, Ltd., NAPA Advisory Council on Alzheimer's Research, and Tau Consortium Investigator's Meeting; and has received income from C2N Diagnostics for serving on the scientific advisory board and drugs and services from Eisai Co., Ltd., Janssen, and F. Hoffmann‐La Roche, Ltd. for the DIAN‐TU Next Generation and Open Label Extension trials. JPC reports consulting fees from Humana, MedaCorp, and ExpertConnect. TLSB reports consulting fees, honoraria, and/or advisory board compensation from Biogen, Eli Lilly and Company, Eisai Co., Ltd., Siemens, Bristol Myers Squibb, and technology transfer and precursors for radiopharmaceuticals from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, LMI, and Cerveau/Lantheus. TLSB reports participation in the ASNR Alzheimer's and ARIA Study Group, QIBA Amyloid PET Working Group, Alzheimer's Association Clinical Tau PET Work Group, and the American College of Radiology/AlzNet Work Group. The other authors report no conflicts of interest. Author disclosures are available in the supporting information.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Cross‐sectional regional PiB uptake as a function of EYO. (A and B) Brain maps displaying significant different slope estimates between PiB SUVR and EYO for 34 cortical (A) and subcortical (B) FreeSurfer regions in pre‐200 carriers versus non‐carriers (top row), post‐200 carriers versus non‐carriers (middle row), and pre‐200 versus post‐200 (bottom row). The rostral anterior cingulate (green outline) and caudate showed the strongest divergence between pre‐ and post‐200. (C and D) Plots of cross‐sectional PiB uptake as a function of EYO for pre‐200 carriers (blue triangle), post‐200 carriers (red square), and non‐carriers (black circle) in rostral anterior cingulate (C) and in caudate (D). Color bar = estimates from LME model of PiB SUVR per EYO. EYO, estimated years to symptom onset; LME, linear mixed effect; NC, non‐carriers; MC, mutation carrier; PiB, Pittsburgh compound B; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Topographical and temporal progression profiles of regional Aβ burden accumulation in pre‐ and post‐200 MC groups per 5‐year range of EYO. Brain maps displaying regional PiB uptake estimates for pre‐ and post‐200 MC groups compared to non‐carriers and pre‐ compared to post‐200 group (third row), split by EYO ranges of 5 years. Colored regions are significantly different in corresponding 5‐year range, and regions in gray are not significantly different after multiple comparisons. The post‐200 MC group starts to show abnormal accumulation in the occipital cortex between −20 and −15 EYO, while pre‐200 shows abnormal burden in occipital and frontal areas around −15 to −10 EYO but display higher values past −5 EYO and beyond. Color bar = estimates of regional mean PiB SUVR. EYO, estimated years to symptom onset; NC, non‐carriers; PiB, Pittsburgh compound B; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
PSMD maps in NCs and pre‐ and post‐200 carriers per 10‐year range of EYO. Axial sections representing averaged mean diffusivity maps for each group per ranges of 10 years. High mean diffusivity in yellow reflects more injury in white matter. Late stages EYO ≥ 0 show higher mean diffusivity in carrier groups. The corresponding average PSMD values per group are indicated in reference (units in square millimeters per second [mm2/s]). EYO, estimated years to symptom onset; NC, non‐carrier; PSMD, peak width of skeletonized mean diffusivity; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio. Color bar = mean diffusivity. Image orientations: L, left; A, anterior.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Cross‐sectional progression of global imaging markers of SVD in NC and pre‐ and post‐200 MC groups. (A) Scatterplot of raw PSMD values as a function of EYO (left panel) and plots of LME mean estimates of PSMD for pre‐200 carriers (blue triangle), post‐200 carriers (red square), and non‐carriers (black circle) per 10‐year range of EYO (right panel). Post‐200 carriers have significantly higher injury with advanced EYO compared to NCs and pre‐200 MC. (B) Scatterplot of log‐transformed total WMH volume values as a function of EYO (left panel) and plots of LME mean estimates of log‐transformed total WMH volume per 10‐year range of EYO (right panel). Both pre‐ and post‐200 MC show larger volumes compared to NC at EYO≥0. (C) Scatterplot of log‐transformed total mH count (dark red horizontal line denotes 5 mH) as a function of EYO (left panel), and plots of negative binomial mixed effect models mean estimates of total count of mHs broken down by EYO −15, −10, −5, and 0. Post‐200 MC have more mHs compared to pre‐200 MC at EYO = −10 and EYO = −5 years. EYO, estimated years to symptom onset; LME, linear mixed effect; mH, microhemorrhage; MC, mutation carrier; NC, non‐carrier; PSMD, peak width of skeletonized mean diffusivity; PVWMH, periventricular white matter hyperintensity; SVD, small vessel disease; WMH, white matter hyperintensity. Significance levels: *p < 0.05; **p  < 0.005, ***p < 0.0005 in blue for pre‐200 versus NC, in red for post‐200 versus NC, and in black for pre‐200 versus post‐200 carriers.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Cross‐sectional progression of regional imaging markers of SVD in non‐carrier, pre‐ and post‐200 MC groups. (A) Scatterplot of regional WMH volumes as a function of EYO (left panel) and plots of LME mean estimates (middle panel) of deep, total periventricular, anterior, and posterior periventricular (top to bottom) WMH for pre‐200 carriers (blue triangle), post‐200 carriers (red square), and NCs (black circle) by per 10‐year range of EYO. Deep WMH is presented as log (1 + x) to facilitate visualization. (B) Scatterplot of regional mH count as a function of EYO (right panel) for frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital (top to bottom). Counts are presented as log (1 + x) to facilitate visualization and dark red horizontal lines denote five mHs. EYO, estimated years to symptom onset; mH, microhemorrhage; NC, non‐carrier; MC, mutation carrier; PVWMH, periventricular white matter hyperintensity; SVD, small vessel disease; WMH, white matter hyperintensity. Significance levels: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.0005 in blue for pre‐200 versus NC, in red for post‐200 versus NC, and in black for pre‐200 versus post‐200 carriers.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Cross‐sectional progression of clinical and cognitive measures in pre‐ and post‐200 MC groups per 5‐year range of EYO. Scatterplot of raw values as a function of EYO (left panel) and plots of LME mean estimates (right panel) of CDR‐SB (top), MMSE (middle), and cognitive composite (bottom) for pre‐200 (blue triangle), post‐200 carriers (red square), and NCs (black circle) by EYO ranges. Post‐200 had worse measures of CDR‐SB and MMSE in EYO +5 years compared to pre‐200 carriers. EYO, estimated years to symptom onset; LME, linear mixed effect; MC, mutation carrier; NC, non‐carrier; CDR‐SB, Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes; MMSE, Mini‐Mental State Examination. Significance levels: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.0005 in blue for pre‐200 versus NC, in red for post‐200 versus NC, and in black for pre‐200 versus post‐200 carriers.

References

    1. Ryman DC, Acosta‐Baena N, Aisen PS, et al. Symptom onset in autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Neurology. 2014;83(3):253‐260. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000596 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hardy J. The Amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science. 2002;297(5580):353‐356. doi:10.1126/science.1072994 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TLS, et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(9):795‐804. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1202753 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gordon BA, Blazey TM, Christensen J, et al. Tau PET in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: relationship with cognition, dementia and other biomarkers. Brain. 2019;142(4):1063‐1076. doi:10.1093/brain/awz019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weggen S, Beher D. Molecular consequences of amyloid precursor protein and presenilin mutations causing autosomal‐dominant Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2012;4(2):9. doi:10.1186/alzrt107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts