Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 May 1;159(5):529-537.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.7996.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy With PD-1 Blockade for High-Risk Proficient Mismatch Repair Rectal Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy With PD-1 Blockade for High-Risk Proficient Mismatch Repair Rectal Cancer

Yingjie Li et al. JAMA Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, especially for patients with high-risk factors. However, the efficacy of TNT combined with immunotherapy for patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) rectal cancer is unknown.

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of TNT with induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by long-course chemoradiation in patients with high-risk, pMMR rectal cancer and to identify potential molecular biomarkers associated with treatment efficacy.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study was a single-arm phase 2 trial conducted at Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, from June 2020 to October 2021. Biopsies and plasma were collected before treatment for whole-exome sequencing and cell-free DNA sequencing, respectively. Data were analyzed from May 2022 to September 2022.

Interventions: Participants received 3 cycles of induction oxaliplatin and capecitabine combined with camrelizumab and radiotherapy (50.6 Gy in 22 fractions) with concurrent capecitabine. Patients without disease progression received 2 cycles of consolidation oxaliplatin/capecitabine.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was pathologic complete response rate.

Results: Of 25 patients enrolled (19 men [76%]; 6 women [24%]; median [IQR] age, 58 [48-64] years), 22 patients (88%) completed the TNT schedule. The pathologic complete response rate was 33.3% (7/21). Twelve patients (48%) achieved clinical complete response, and 4 patients (16%) chose to watch and wait. R0 resection was achieved in 21 of 21 patients, and the major pathologic response rate was 38.1% (8/21). The most common adverse event was nausea (80%, 20/25); grade 3 toxic effects occurred in 9 of 25 patients (36%). Patients with tumor shrinkage of 50% or greater after induction oxaliplatin/capecitabine and camrelizumab or clinical complete response had higher percentages of LRP1B mutation. Mutation of LRP1B was associated with high tumor mutation burden and tumor neoantigen burden. Patients with high tumor mutation burden all benefited from therapy.

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that TNT with induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by long-course chemoradiation was safe and effective for patients with high-risk rectal cancer with pMMR status. Longer follow-up and larger clinical studies are needed to validate this innovative regimen. There is also an urgent need to further validate the predictive value of LRP1B and discover other novel biomarkers with potential predictive value for rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr A. Wu reported grants from Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Clinical Trial Profile
The primary end point was pathologic complete response rate. The secondary end points included 3-year disease-free survival, surgical complication rate, adverse events, relationship between biomarkers, and efficacy. cfDNA-seq indicates circulating free DNA sequencing; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell analysis; PD-1, programmed cell death 1; WES, whole-exome sequencing. aFour patients chose to watch and wait, 3 who achieved clinical complete response and 1 near clinical complete response. bCamrelizumab, 200 mg, on day 1; oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m2, on day 1; and capecitabine, 1250 mg/m2, twice daily on day 1-14 every 3 wk for 3 cycles. cIntensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): gross tumor volume, 50.6 Gy, and clinical target volume, 41.8 Gy, per 22 fractions (22f); oral capecitabine, 825 mg/m2, twice a day. dOxaliplatin, 130 mg/m2, on day 1 and oral capecitabine, 1250 mg/m2, twice daily on day 1-14 for 2 cycles.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Treatment
A, Waterfall plots of radiographic response after the induction chemotherapy combined with camrelizumab. B, Waterfall plots of radiographic response before the surgery. C, Response and duration for the patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. CCR indicates clinical complete response; MPR, major pathologic response; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; pCR, pathologic complete response; PD-1, programmed cell death 1; pPR, pathologic partial response; WW, watch and wait.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Genomic Characteristics of Tumors at Baseline for Proficient Mismatch Repair, High-Risk, and Locally Advanced Middle to Low Rectal Cancer
A, The distribution of nonsynonymous driver mutation events is shown in the center heat map. B, Mutation percentage of LRP1B. C, Comparison of tumor mutation burden (TMB) and tumor neoantigen burden (TNB). CCR indicates clinical complete response; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; MPR, major pathologic response; MSI, microsatellite instability; pCR, pathologic complete response; pPR, pathologic partial response; WW, watch and wait.

References

    1. Bahadoer RR, Dijkstra EA, van Etten B, et al. ; RAPIDO collaborative investigators . Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(1):29-42. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30555-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braendengen M, Tveit KM, Berglund A, et al. . Randomized phase III study comparing preoperative radiotherapy with chemoradiotherapy in nonresectable rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(22):3687-3694. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3858 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, et al. ; EORTC Radiotherapy Group Trial 22921 . Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(11):1114-1123. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa060829 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R, et al. . Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9666):811-820. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60484-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gérard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S, et al. . Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(10):1638-1644. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8376 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types