Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for KOOS After Total Knee Arthroplasty
- PMID: 38381811
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00027
Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for KOOS After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Abstract
Update: This article was updated on May 1, 2024 because of a previous error, which was discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. The byline that had read "Ahmed K. Emara, MD 1 *, Ignacio Pasqualini, MD 1 *, Alison K. Klika, MS 1 , Melissa N. Orr, BS 1 , Pedro J. Rullán, MD 1 , Nicolas S. Piuzzi, MD 1 , and the Cleveland Clinic Arthroplasty Group†" now reads "Ahmed K. Emara, MD 1 *, Ignacio Pasqualini, MD 1 *, Yuxuan Jin, MS 1 , Alison K. Klika, MS 1 , Melissa N. Orr, BS 1 , Pedro J. Rullán, MD 1 , Nicolas S. Piuzzi, MD 1 , and the Cleveland Clinic Arthroplasty Group†".
Background: Literature-reported minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for patient-reported outcome measures demonstrate marked variability. The purpose of this study was to determine the minimal detectable change (MDC), MCID, and PASS thresholds for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain subdomain, Physical Function Short Form (PS), and Joint Replacement (JR) among patients with osteoarthritis (OA) who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Methods: A prospective cohort of 6,778 patients who underwent primary TKA was analyzed. Overall, 1-year follow-up was completed by 5,316 patients for the KOOS Pain, 5,018 patients for the KOOS PS, and 4,033 patients for the KOOS JR. A total of 5,186 patients had an OA diagnosis; this group had an average age of 67.0 years and was 59.9% female and 80.4% White. Diagnosis-specific MDCs and MCIDs were estimated with use of a distribution-based approach. PASS values were estimated with use of an anchor-based approach, which corresponded to a response to a satisfaction question at 1 year postoperatively.
Results: The MCID thresholds for the OA group were 7.9 for the KOOS Pain, 8.0 for the KOOS PS, and 6.7 for the KOOS JR. A high percentage of patients achieved the MCID threshold for each outcome measure (KOOS Pain, 95%; KOOS PS, 88%; and KOOS JR, 94%). The MDC 80% to 95% confidence intervals ranged from 9.1 to 14.0 for the KOOS Pain, 9.2 to 14.1 for the KOOS PS, and 7.7 to 11.8 for the KOOS JR. The PASS thresholds for the OA group were 77.7 for the KOOS Pain (achieved by 73% of patients), 70.3 for the KOOS PS (achieved by 68% of patients), and 70.7 for the KOOS JR (achieved by 70% of patients).
Conclusions: The present study provided useful MCID, MDC, and PASS thresholds for the KOOS Pain, PS, and JR for patients with OA. The diagnosis-specific metrics established herein can serve as benchmarks for clinically meaningful postoperative improvement. Future research and quality assessments should utilize these OA-specific thresholds when evaluating outcomes following TKA. Doing so will enable more accurate determinations of operative success and improvements in patient-centered care.
Level of evidence: Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: No external funding was received for this work. The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H889 ).
Similar articles
-
What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Dec;476(12):2432-2441. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000456. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018. PMID: 30179951 Free PMC article.
-
What Are the Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jul;39(7):1783-1788.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.051. Epub 2024 Feb 7. J Arthroplasty. 2024. PMID: 38331359
-
Defining Patient-relevant Thresholds and Change Scores for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR Anchored on the Patient-acceptable Symptom State Question.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Apr 1;482(4):688-698. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002857. Epub 2023 Sep 29. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 37773026 Free PMC article.
-
There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jan 1;481(1):63-80. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002440. Epub 2022 Oct 5. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023. PMID: 36200846 Free PMC article.
-
Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Apr 1;481(4):702-714. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002434. Epub 2022 Oct 19. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023. PMID: 36398323 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Prevalence and impact of preoperative osteoporosis on healthcare utilization and patient-reported outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Aug 4;35(1):339. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04418-x. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025. PMID: 40760057 Free PMC article.
-
Mapping the importance of each individual element accounted by HOOS and VR-12 on 1-year patient satisfaction after primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective institutional analysis.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 May 21;35(1):209. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04311-7. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025. PMID: 40399733 Free PMC article.
-
Intraoperative kinematics of the bicruciate retaining TKA using functional alignment and their influence on the clinical outcomes.Arthroplasty. 2025 Jul 3;7(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s42836-025-00319-w. Arthroplasty. 2025. PMID: 40605064 Free PMC article.
-
Patient specific variables impact sensitivity to association between joint balance and 2 Year outcomes.J Orthop. 2024 Dec 12;65:71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.12.007. eCollection 2025 Jul. J Orthop. 2024. PMID: 39801901
References
-
- Emara AK, Klika AK, Piuzzi NS. Evidence-Based Orthopedic Surgery-From Synthesis to Practice. JAMA Surg. 2020 Nov 1;155(11):1009-10.
-
- Okafor L, Chen AF. Patient satisfaction and total hip arthroplasty: a review. Arthroplasty. 2019 Sep 2;1(1):6.
-
- Sodhi N, Piuzzi NS, Khlopas A, Newman JM, Kryzak TJ, Stearns KL, Mont MA. Are We Appropriately Compensated by Relative Value Units for Primary vs Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):340-4.
-
- OME Cleveland Clinic Orthopaedics. Value in Research: Achieving Validated Outcome Measurements While Mitigating Follow-up Cost. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(5):419-27.
-
- Lyman S, Lee YY, Franklin PD, Li W, Cross MB, Padgett DE. Validation of the KOOS, JR: A Short-form Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1461-71.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials