Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 19:58:02.
doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005585. eCollection 2024.

Contraindicated use of modern contraceptives among mothers from a Pelotas Birth Cohort

Affiliations

Contraindicated use of modern contraceptives among mothers from a Pelotas Birth Cohort

Gbènankpon Mathias Houvèssou et al. Rev Saude Publica. .

Abstract

Objective: To describe the prevalence of contraindicated use of combined hormonal contraceptives, progesterone-only contraceptives, and intrauterine devices in mothers participating in the 2015 Pelotas Birth Cohort according to the WHO medical eligibility criteria.

Methods: The biological mothers of children belonging to the 2015 Pelotas birth cohort who attended the 48-month follow-up were studied. The 48-month follow-up data were collected from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. Contraindicated use of modern contraceptives was considered to occur when these women presented at least one of the contraindications for the use of modern contraceptives and were using these methods. The prevalence of contraindicated use was calculated according to each independent variable and their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

Results: The analyzed sample consisted of 3,053 women who used any modern contraceptive method. The prevalence of contraindicated use of modern contraceptives totaled 25.9% (95%CI: 24.4-27.5). Combined hormonal contraceptives showed the highest prevalence of contraindicated use (52.1%; 95%CI: 49.3-54.8). The prevalence of contraindicated use of modern contraceptives methods was greater in women with family income between one and three minimum wages, a 25-30 kg/m2 body mass index, indication by a gynecologist for the used method, and purchasing the contraceptive method at a pharmacy. The higher the women's education, the lower the prevalence of inappropriate use of modern contraceptives.

Conclusion: In total, one in four women used modern contraceptives despite showing at least one contraindication. Policies regarding women's reproductive health should be strengthened.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure
Figure. Sample selection flowchart.

Similar articles

References

    1. Festin MP, Kiarie J, Solo J, Spieler J, Malarcher S, Van Look PF, et al. Moving towards the goals of FP2020: classifying contraceptives. Contraception. 2016 Oct;94(4):289–294. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.05.015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hubacher D, Trussell J. A definition of modern contraceptive methods. Contraception. 2015 Nov;92(5):420–421. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.08.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chibuye N. Family structure and modern contraceptive use among women in Malawi. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand; 2016.
    1. Daniels K, Daugherty J, Jones J, Mosher W. Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2015 Nov;86(86):1–14. - PubMed
    1. Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H, Ross J, Tsui A. Contraception and health. Lancet. 2012 Jul;380(9837):149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736 (12)60609-6 . - DOI - PubMed

Substances