Similar articles

• Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.

  Adeniji OA, Oladokun A, Olayemi O, Adeniji OI, Odukogbe AA, Ogunbode O, Aimakhu CO, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO. Adeniji OA, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Feb;25(2):134-9. doi: 10.1080/01443610500040737. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005. PMID: 15814391 Clinical Trial.
• Comparison of Vaginal Dinoprostone Pessary With Transcervical Balloon Catheter Plus Vaginal Misoprostol for Pre-induction Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Trial.

  M K, Jain V, Arora A, Kumar J. M K, et al. Cureus. 2023 Jul 21;15(7):e42261. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42261. eCollection 2023 Jul. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37605669 Free PMC article.
• Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.

  Rust OA, Greybush M, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Balducci J. Rust OA, et al. J Reprod Med. 2001 Oct;46(10):899-904. J Reprod Med. 2001. PMID: 11725734 Clinical Trial.
• Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening.

  Chen W, Xue J, Gaudet L, Walker M, Wen SW. Chen W, et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;129(3):193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Mar 10. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015. PMID: 25794821 Review.
• Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.

  Lee HH, Huang BS, Cheng M, Yeh CC, Lin IC, Horng HC, Huang HY, Lee WL, Wang PH. Lee HH, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 11;17(6):1825. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061825. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32168947 Free PMC article.