Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 21;10(1):39.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01463-x.

Robot-assisted partial knee replacement versus standard total knee replacement (RoboKnees): a protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Kim Madden  1   2   3 , Breanne Flood  4 , Monica Malek  4   5 , Vincent Milantoni  6 , Janie L Astephen Wilson  7 , Jean-Eric Tarride  4   8 , Vickas Khanna  6   4 , Anthony Adili  6   4   5 ; RoboKnees Investigators
Collaborators, Affiliations

Robot-assisted partial knee replacement versus standard total knee replacement (RoboKnees): a protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Kim Madden et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty is a common surgery for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Partial knee arthroplasty is also a treatment option for patients with arthritis present in only one or two knee compartments. Partial knee arthroplasty can preserve the natural knee biomechanics, but these replacements may not last as long as total knee replacements. Robotic-assisted orthopedic techniques can help facilitate partial knee replacements, increasing accuracy and precision. This trial will investigate the feasibility and assess clinical outcomes for a larger definitive trial.

Methods: This is a protocol for an ongoing parallel randomized pilot trial of 64 patients with uni- or bicompartmental knee arthritis. Patients are randomized to either receive robot-assisted partial knee arthroplasty or manual total knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome of this pilot is investigating the feasibility of a larger trial. Secondary (clinical) outcomes include joint awareness, return to activities, knee function, patient global impression of change, persistent post-surgical pain, re-operations, resource utilization and cost-effectiveness, health-related quality of life, radiographic alignment, knee kinematics during walking gait, and complications up to 24 months post-surgery.

Discussion: The RoboKnees pilot study is the first step in determining the outcome of robot-assisted partial knee replacements. Conclusions from this study will be used to design future large-scale trials. This study will inform surgeons about the potential benefits of robot-assisted partial knee replacements.

Trial registration: This study was prospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT04378049) on 4 May 2020, before the first patient was randomized.

Keywords: Feasibility; Knee replacement; Protocol; Randomized controlled trial; Robot-assisted surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic of study design
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Canada S. Table 13-10-0096-06 Health characteristics, annual estimates. 2022.
    1. Information, CIfH, Hip and Knee Replacements in Canada: CJRR Quick Stats, 2019–2020. 2021: Ottawa, ON.
    1. Bourne RB, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):57–63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beswick AD, et al. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012;2(1):e000435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wodowski AJ, et al. Proprioception and knee arthroplasty: a literature review. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016;47(2):301–309. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2015.09.005. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

Grants and funding