Uncovering the interhospital price variations for vasectomies in the United States
- PMID: 38383856
- DOI: 10.1038/s41443-024-00833-6
Uncovering the interhospital price variations for vasectomies in the United States
Abstract
Due to the historic lack of transparency in healthcare pricing in the United States, the degree of price variation for vasectomy is largely unknown. Our study aims to assess characteristics of hospitals reporting prices for vasectomy as well as price variation associated with hospital factors and insurance status. A cross-sectional analysis was performed in October, 2022 using the Turquoise Database which compiles publicly available hospital pricing data. The database was queried for vasectomy prices to identify the cash (paid by patients not using insurance), commercial (negotiated by private insurers) and Medicare and Medicaid prices for vasectomies. Hospital characteristics of those that reported a price for vasectomy and those that did not were compared and pricing differences based on hospital ownership and reimbursement source were determined using multivariable linear regression analysis. Overall, only 24.7% (1657/6700) of hospitals reported a price for vasectomy. Those that reported a price had more beds (median 117 vs 80, p < 0.001), more physicians (median 1745 vs 1275, p < 0.001). They were also more likely to be nonprofit hospitals (77% vs 14%, p < 0.001) and to be in well-resourced areas (ADI 91.7 vs 94.4, p < 0.001). Both commercial prices and cash prices for vasectomy were lower at nonprofit hospitals than at for-profit hospitals (commercial: $1959.47 vs $2861.56, p < 0.001; cash: $1429.74 vs $3185.37, p < 0.001). Our study highlights the current state of pricing transparency for vasectomy in the United States. Patients may be counseled to consider seeking vasectomy at a nonprofit hospital to reduce their costs, especially when paying with cash. These findings also suggest a need for new policies to target areas with decreased price transparency to reduce price disparities.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Comment on: Uncovering the interhospital price variations for vasectomies in the United States.Int J Impot Res. 2024 Jun 6. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00924-4. Online ahead of print. Int J Impot Res. 2024. PMID: 38844813 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Potential Factors Associated With Commercial-to-Medicare Relative Prices at the Substate Level.JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jul 3;6(7):e251640. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1640. JAMA Health Forum. 2025. PMID: 40608307 Free PMC article.
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280. Health Technol Assess. 2008. PMID: 18547499
-
Within-Hospital Price Gaps Across National Insurers.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2451941. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51941. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39714838 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17999840
Cited by
-
Comparison of Childless and Partnerless Vasectomy Rates Before and After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.Am J Mens Health. 2024 May-Jun;18(3):15579883241260511. doi: 10.1177/15579883241260511. Am J Mens Health. 2024. PMID: 38872304 Free PMC article.
-
Financial considerations among adult men undergoing vasectomy: cost analysis and modeling of outpatient costs associated with vasectomy.Transl Androl Urol. 2025 May 30;14(5):1355-1362. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-33. Epub 2025 May 27. Transl Androl Urol. 2025. PMID: 40529045 Free PMC article.
-
Provider views on vasectomy: cultural, gender, and political elements of Men's decisions to seek publicly funded services.Front Reprod Health. 2024 Dec 18;6:1386244. doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1386244. eCollection 2024. Front Reprod Health. 2024. PMID: 39744246 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ostrowski KA, Holt SK, Haynes B, Davies BJ, Fuchs EF, Walsh TJ. Evaluation of Vasectomy Trends in the United States. Urology. 2018;118:76–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.016 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bole R, Lundy SD, Pei E, Bajic P, Parekh N, Vij SC. Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States. Int J Impot Res. 2023:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00672-x .
-
- Sellke N, Tay K, Sun HH, Tatem A, Loeb A, Thirumavalavan N. The unprecedented increase in Google searches for “vasectomy” after the reversal of Roe vs. Wade. Fertil Steril. 2022;118:1186–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.859 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Papanicolas I, Woskie LR, Jha AK. Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries. JAMA. 2018;319:1024–39. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.1150 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gunja MZ, Gumas ED, Williams II RD. U.S. Health Care from a Global Perspective, 2022: Accelerating Spending, Worsening Outcomes. 2022. https://doi.org/10.26099/8ejy-yc74 .
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources