Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 7:11:1233962.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1233962. eCollection 2024.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy optimizes reproductive outcomes in recurrent reproductive failure: a systematic review

Affiliations

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy optimizes reproductive outcomes in recurrent reproductive failure: a systematic review

Youwen Mei et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Introduction: Recurrent reproductive failure (RRF) is a common pregnancy complication, imposing great physical, emotional and financial burden for the suffered couples. The leading cause of RRF is believed to be aneuploid embryo, which could be solved by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in theory. With molecular genetic development, PGT-A based on comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS) procedures and blastocyst biopsy is widely applied in clinical practice. However, its effects in RRF were not defined yet.

Methods: A systematic bibliographical search was conducted without temporal limits up to June, 2023. Studies about the effects of PGT-A based on CCS procedures and blastocyst biopsy in RRF were included.

Results: Twenty studies about the effects of PGT-A based on CCS procedures and blastocyst biopsy in RRF were included. It revealed that PGT-A could optimise the reproductive outcomes of RRF sufferers, especially in those with advanced age. However, in patients with multiple occurrences of pregnancy losses, the benefits of PGT-A were limited.

Discussion: More randomized controlled trials with large sample size are required to evaluate the benefits of PGT-A in RRF sufferers and identify which population would benefit the most.

Keywords: blastocyst biopsy; comprehensive chromosomal screening; preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploid; recurrent implantation failure; recurrent pregnancy loss; recurrent reproductive failure; reproductive outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The search strategy diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. al-Lamee H, Ellison A, Drury J, Hill CJ, Drakeley AJ, Hapangama DK, et al. . Altered endometrial oestrogen-responsiveness and recurrent reproductive failure. Reprod Fertil. (2022) 3:30–8. doi: 10.1530/RAF-21-0093, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Medicine PCotASfR . Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. (2012) 98:1103–11. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.048, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. The ESHRE Guideline Group on RPL. Bender Atik R, Christiansen OB, Elson J, Kolte AM, Lewis S, et al. . ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss: an update in 2022. Hum Reprod Open. (2023) 2023:hoad002. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad002, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Margalioth EJ, Ben-Chetrit A, Gal M, Eldar-Geva T. Investigation and treatment of repeated implantation failure following IVF-ET. Hum Reprod. (2006) 21:3036–43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del305, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Busnelli A, Reschini M, Cardellicchio L, Vegetti W, Somigliana E, Vercellini P. How common is real repeated implantation failure? An indirect estimate of the prevalence. Reprod Biomed Online. (2020) 40:91–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.10.014, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources