Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 9;27(3):108835.
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108835. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.

Airway inflammation accelerates pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis

Affiliations

Airway inflammation accelerates pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis

Theodore G Liou et al. iScience. .

Abstract

Airway inflammation underlies cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations. In a prospective multicenter study of randomly selected, clinically stable adolescents and adults, we assessed relationships between 24 inflammation-associated molecules and the future occurrence of CF pulmonary exacerbation using proportional hazards models. We explored relationships for potential confounding or mediation by clinical factors and assessed sensitivities to treatments including CF transmembrane regulator (CFTR) protein synthesis modulators. Results from 114 participants, including seven on ivacaftor or lumacaftor-ivacaftor, representative of the US CF population during the study period, identified 10 biomarkers associated with future exacerbations mediated by percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s. The findings were not sensitive to anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, and CFTR modulator treatments. The analyses suggest that combination treatments addressing RAGE-axis inflammation, protease-mediated injury, and oxidative stress might prevent pulmonary exacerbations. Our work may apply to other airway inflammatory diseases such as bronchiectasis and the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Keywords: Health sciences; Medical specialty; Medicine; Omics; respiratory medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

T.G.L., J.A.F., J.L.J., Y.L., K.A.P., and J.B.V. received other support from the CFF (CC132-16AD, LIOU14Y0, LIOU14P0) and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01 HL125520) and received support during the current study for performing clinical trials from Abbvie, Calithera Biosciences, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Laurent Pharmaceuticals, Nivalis Therapeutics, Novartis, Proteostasis, Savara Pharmaceuticals, Translate Bio, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals. F.R.A. received additional other support from the NHLBI/NIH (R01 HL125520), the National Science Foundation (EMSW21-RTG), and the Margolis Family Foundation of Utah. P.S.B. received other support from the CFF (Center and TDC grants) and the NHLBI/NIH (U01 HL114623) and received support for a clinical trial from Alcresta Therapeutics. B.A.C. received other support from the CFF (C112–12, C112-TDC09Y, 10063SUB, 41339154.s132P010379SUB) and received support for clinical trials from Genentech, Novartis, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals. C.L.D. received other support from the CFF (C004–11, C004-TDC09Y, DAINES11Y3) and from the Health Resources and Services Administration (T72MC00012). J.A.F. transitioned to become an employee of ICON plc, a clinical research organization involved in various trials pertinent to CF during the study and is now an employee of Vertex Pharmaceuticals; JAF, ICON, and Vertex had no direct involvement in performance of the study following the initial change in affiliation. T.H. received other support from the CFF (PACE, Center Grant) and received support for clinical trials from Celtaxsys and Vertex Pharmaceuticals. J.R.H. received other support from the NHLBI/NIH (HHSN268200900018C) and the Veterans Administration Healthcare System (I01 BX001533). J.L. received other support from the CFF (C017-11AF). C.N. received other support from the CFF (C138-12). P.R. received other support from the CFF (C003–12, C003-TDC09Y). S.D.S. received other support from the CFF (AQUADEK12K1, SAGEL11CS0, GOAL13K2, NICK13A0, SAGEL14K1, NICK15R0) and the NHLBI/NIH (U54 HL096458) and the NCATS/NIH (Colorado CTSA Grant Number UL1 TR002535). J.L.T.-C. received other support from the CFF (TDC) and the NHLBI/NIH (HL103801) and received support for clinical trials from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. K.N.O. was funded by the intramural research program of the NHLBI, NIH, during the study. Neither the project sponsors nor any sources of other support had direct roles in development and conduct of the study. None of the sponsors of clinical trials mentioned earlier participated in any way with this trial.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Directed acyclic graph of biomarkers and pulmonary exacerbation in CF The heavy arrow shows the key relationships targeted by study. Thin unidirectional arrows indicate either Mediator relationships (top) involving variables that are intermediate outcomes in causal pathways between biomarkers and exacerbations or Confounder relationships (bottom) involving variables associated with both biomarkers and exacerbations but not as intermediates. Mediators obscure biomarker-exacerbation relationships unless excluded from explanatory models. In contrast, confounders may introduce spurious associations between biomarkers and exacerbations unless some are included as model adjustments. Not all potential confounders and mediators are shown. Individual biomarkers included C reactive protein (CRP); calprotectin; extracellular newly identified receptor for advanced glycation end products binding protein (ENRAGE); granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GMCSF); high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1); intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1); interferon γ (IFNγ); interleukin (IL)-1β, -5, -6, -8, -10, -17A; matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9); myeloperoxidase (MPO); neutrophil elastase (NE); proteinase 3 (PR3); s100A8 and s100A9; soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE); secretory leukoprotease inhibitor (SLPI); thymus and activation regulation chemokine (TARC); tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα); and chitinase 3-like 1 protein (YKL40).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier plots exploring relationships of clinical factors with time to next pulmonary exacerbation Patients were stratified into evenly sized groups when possible in each Number at Risk legend for (A) 5-year prognostic risk score. (B) Number of pulmonary exacerbations in the year prior to enrollment. (C) Weight-for-age Z score. (D) FEV1%. (E) CF-related diabetes status and (F) respiratory rate. Measurements and status were from the day of enrollment. Patients were followed until occurrence of the next pulmonary exacerbation and censored. Groups are unequal in size for number of prior exacerbations, diabetes and respiratory rate because those values are ordinal and do not allow more even distribution. Results of log rank tests are shown in each panel legend. See also Table S2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportional hazards models of time to next exacerbation (A) Forest plots of hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals derived from biomarker values as univariables adjusted for assay detection limits (gray) or assay detection limits and age and number of prior year pulmonary exacerbations as confounders (red). The upper 95% confidence limit for TARC adjusted by age and prior exacerbations is 6.80. (B) Graphical FDR analysis was applied to hazard ratios adjusted by age and exacerbations. Using the p values for each hazard ratio, we ranked the potential biomarkers and drew lines with slopes determined by the thresholds for false discovery (set to 0.1 and 0.2) divided by the number of potential biomarkers in the entire study. A biomarker falling below a threshold line has a fractional chance of being a true finding, which is greater than 1—FDR threshold for that line. Once a biomarker is plotted above a threshold line, no biomarkers with a larger rank are considered to be below that threshold. ENRAGE falls below the FDR 0.1 line, whereas MPO is just above, hence the next eight are considered below the FDR 0.2 threshold and not below FDR 0.1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationships between biomarkers and FEV1% (A) Forest plots show linear regression model effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals for associations between inflammatory biomarkers adjusted for assay detection limits and FEV1%. (B) FDR analysis shows nine biomarkers retain significance for associations with FEV1%, three each at FDR < 0.001, FDR < 0.01, and FDR < 0.05. (C) Significance of hazard ratios of biomarkers when used in models with FEV1% for time to next pulmonary exacerbation (gray) is reduced during testing and confirmation of FEV1% as a mediator (salmon) even when adjusted by age and prior pulmonary exacerbations (red). (See Figure S2 for the results of FDR analysis of unadjusted bivariable models.) The order of biomarkers allows easier comparison with Figure 2A. (D) In mediation testing of FEV1%, no biomarkers used as adjustments to FEV1% for proportional hazards models of time to next pulmonary exacerbation clearly retain statistical significance after FDR analysis with FDR < 0.2.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relationship between RAGE axis, protease-antiprotease imbalance, oxidant injury, and lung function Three pathways of injury with representative biomarkers shown contribute to reducing lung function. Sharp decreases in lung function are the most frequent indicator used by clinicians making a diagnosis of pulmonary exacerbation of CF.

References

    1. Zemanick E.T., Wagner B.D., Robertson C.E., Ahrens R.C., Chmiel J.F., Clancy J.P., Gibson R.L., Harris W.T., Kurland G., Laguna T.A., et al. Airway microbiota across age and disease spectrum in cystic fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J. 2017;50 doi: 10.1183/13993003.00832-2017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Granchelli A.M., Adler F.R., Keogh R.H., Kartsonaki C., Cox D.R., Liou T.G. Microbial Interactions in the Cystic Fibrosis Airway. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018;56:e00354-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00354-18. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flume P.A., Wainwright C.E., Elizabeth Tullis D., Rodriguez S., Niknian M., Higgins M., Davies J.C., Wagener J.S. Recovery of lung function following a pulmonary exacerbation in patients with cystic fibrosis and the G551D-CFTR mutation treated with ivacaftor. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2018;17:83–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2017.06.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tunney M.M., Wark P. Long-term therapy with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) in cystic fibrosis: improved clinical outcomes but infection and inflammation persist. Eur. Respir. J. 2023;62 doi: 10.1183/13993003.01008-2023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Casey M., Gabillard-Lefort C., McElvaney O.F., McElvaney O.J., Carroll T., Heeney R.C., Gunaratnam C., Reeves E.P., Murphy M.P., McElvaney N.G. Effect of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on airway and systemic inflammation in cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2023;78:835–839. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2022-219943. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources