Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Endpoints: Moving Beyond Noninducibility

Abstract

In patients with structural heart disease and ventricular tachycardia (VT) undergoing catheter ablation, the response to programmed electrical stimulation (PES) at the end of the procedure has been traditionally used to evaluate the acute success and predict long-term outcomes. Although noninducibility at PES has been extensively investigated and validated in clinical trials and large multicenter registries, its performance in predicting long-term freedom from VT is suboptimal. In addition, PES has inherent limitations related to the influence of background antiarrhythmic drug therapy, periprocedural use of anesthesia, and the heterogeneity in PES protocols. The increased utilization of substrate-based ablation approaches that focus on ablation of abnormal electrograms identified with mapping in sinus or paced rhythm has been paralleled by a need for additional procedural endpoints beyond VT noninducibility at PES. This article critically appraises the relative merits and limitations of different procedural endpoints according to different ablation techniques for catheter ablation of scar-related VT.

Keywords: VT noninducibility; catheter ablation; endpoints; substrate ablation; ventricular tachycardia.