Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May;26(5):287-297.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0412. Epub 2024 Mar 25.

Prevalence, Safety, and Metabolic Control Among Danish Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Using Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery Systems

Affiliations

Prevalence, Safety, and Metabolic Control Among Danish Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Using Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery Systems

Amanda R Fagerberg et al. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 May.

Abstract

Background: Treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has become increasingly technical with rapid developments in integration of pumps and sensors to regulate insulin dosage, and patient-initiated solutions as open-source automated insulin delivery (OS-AID) systems, have gained popularity in people with diabetes. Studies have shown increased glycemic control and mental wellbeing in users of OS-AID systems. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence, the effect on metabolic control, the risk, and the effect on everyday life for users and their parents of OS-AID systems in Danish children and adolescents with T1DM. Methods: This retrospective cohort study recruited participants through pediatric diabetes outpatient clinics and social media. Surveys were distributed and current and retrospective data on glycemic control (HbA1c, time in range [TIR] etc.) were collected. Results: Fifty-six users of OS-AID systems out of 2950 Danish children and adolescents with T1DM were identified from all outpatient clinics in Denmark. Thirty-one responded on contact and were included (55% of the identified), median age 12 [interquartile range: 11-14] years, 51% females, and mean duration of use of OS-AID systems 2.37 ± 0.86 years. Glycemic control increased significantly with TIR increasing from mean 62.29% ± 13.68% to 70.12% ± 10.08%, *P < 0.01, and HbA1c decreasing from mean 50.13 ± 5.76 mmol/mol (6.7% ± 2.7%) to 47.86 ± 6.24 mmol/mol (6.5% ± 2.7%), **P < 0.05. No changes were found in safety parameters. Parents reported better quality of sleep evaluated by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Conclusion: This study is the first to provide knowledge on pediatric users of OS-AID systems in Denmark and found a prevalence of 1.89% for OS-AID systems, improved TIR, and no increased risk associated with use of OS-AID systems.

Keywords: Artificial pancreas; Closed-loop systems; Do-It-Yourself Closed-Loop Systems; HbA1c; Open source; Pediatrics; Sleep; Time in range; Type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author has received salary from Steno Partners and Fund of Dagmar Marshall regarding this work. Furthermore, the author has received a fee from Novo Nordisk for a guest presentation outside of this work. Neither Steno Partners, Fund of Dagmar Marshall, nor Novo Nordisk has influenced the conceptualization, methodology, and analysis or writing of this article.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Showing percentage of time spent with BG in the following ranges: TIR 3.9–10.0 mmol/L (70–180 mg/dL); TAR 10.1–13.9 mmol/L (180–250 mg/dL); TAR >13.9 mmol/L (>250 mg/dL); TBR 3.0–3.9 mmol/L (54–70 mg/dL); TBR <3.0 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL). *Significant changes in percentage of time spent in the specific range when compared to baseline with P-value <0.01; **Significant changes in percentage of time spent in the specific range when compared to baseline with P-value <0.05. TAR, time above range; TBR, time below range; TIR, time in range.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chiang JL, Kirkman MS, Laffel LM, et al. . Type 1 diabetes through the life span: A position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2014;37(7):2034–2054; doi: 10.2337/dc14-1140 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bluestone JA, Herold K, Eisenbarth G. Genetics, pathogenesis and clinical interventions in type 1 diabetes. Nature 2010;464(7293):1293–1300; doi: 10.1038/nature08933 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. J Pediatr 1994;125(2):177–188; doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(94)70190-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolfsdorf JI, Glaser N, Agus M, et al. . ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetic ketoacidosis and the hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state. Pediatr Diabetes 2018;19 Suppl 27:155–177; doi: 10.1111/pedi.12701 - DOI - PubMed
    1. RKKP. Annual Report 2021–2022: Danish Registry of Childhood and Adolescent Diabetes & The Danish Adult Diabetes Registry. The Danish Clinical Quality Program—National Clinical Registries (RKKP); 2022.

Publication types