Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May;15(3):102325.
doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102325. Epub 2024 Feb 21.

History of the geographic distribution of the western blacklegged tick, Ixodes pacificus, in the United States

Affiliations
Review

History of the geographic distribution of the western blacklegged tick, Ixodes pacificus, in the United States

Lars Eisen et al. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2024 May.

Abstract

Ixodes pacificus (the western blacklegged tick) occurs in the far western United States (US), where it commonly bites humans. This tick was not considered a species of medical concern until it was implicated in the 1980s as a vector of Lyme disease spirochetes. Later, it was discovered to also be the primary vector to humans in the far western US of agents causing anaplasmosis and hard tick relapsing fever. The core distribution of I. pacificus in the US includes California, western Oregon, and western Washington, with outlier populations reported in Utah and Arizona. In this review, we provide a history of the documented occurrence of I. pacificus in the US from the 1890s to present, and discuss associations of its geographic range with landscape, hosts, and climate. In contrast to Ixodes scapularis (the blacklegged tick) in the eastern US, there is no evidence for a dramatic change in the geographic distribution of I. pacificus over the last half-century. Field surveys in the 1930s and 1940s documented I. pacificus along the Pacific Coast from southern California to northern Washington, in the Sierra Nevada foothills, and in western Utah. County level collection records often included both immatures and adults of I. pacificus, recovered by drag sampling or from humans, domestic animals, and wildlife. The estimated geographic distribution presented for I. pacificus in 1945 by Bishopp and Trembley is similar to that presented in 2022 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. There is no clear evidence of range expansion for I. pacificus, separate from tick records in new areas that could have resulted from newly initiated or intensified surveillance efforts. Moreover, there is no evidence from long-term studies that the density of questing I. pacificus ticks has increased over time in specific areas. It therefore is not surprising that the incidence of Lyme disease has remained stable in the Pacific Coast states from the early 1990s, when it became a notifiable condition, to present. We note that deforestation and deer depredation were less severe in the far western US during the 1800s and early 1900s compared to the eastern US. This likely contributed to I. pacificus maintaining stable, widespread populations across its geographic range in the far western US in the early 1900s, while I. scapularis during the same time period appears to have been restricted to a small number of geographically isolated refugia sites within its present range in the eastern US. The impact that a warming climate may have had on the geographic distribution and local abundance of I. pacificus in recent decades remains unclear.

Keywords: Geographic distribution; Ixodes pacificus; United States.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest None

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Estimated geographic distribution of Ixodes pacificus in the western United States (from CDC, 2023a).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Distribution of counties in the western United States where Ixodes pacificus was classified as established (shown in red; 6 or more ticks of a single life stage or 2 or more life stages) or reported (shown in blue; fewer than six ticks and one life stage only) by 1996 (Dennis et al., 1998), 2015 (Eisen et al., 2016a), and 2022 (CDC, 2023c).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
California vegetation mapping zones (adapted from USDA, 2023).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams KP, Hamilton RJ, 2011. Management history. In: Hewitt DG (Ed.), Biology and Management of White-Tailed Deer. CRC Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 355–377.
    1. Alkishe A, Raghavan RK, Peterson AT, 2021. Likely geographic distributional shifts among medically important tick species and tick-associated diseases under climate change in North America: a review. Insects 12, 225. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allred DM, Beck DE, White LD, 1960. Ticks of the genus Ixodes in Utah. Brigham Young Univ. Sci. Bull. Biol. Ser 1 (4), 1.
    1. Allred DM, Beck DE, Jorgensen CD, 1963a. Nevada test site study areas and specimen depositories. Brigham Young Univ. Sci. Bull. Biol. Ser 2 (4), 1.
    1. Allred DM, Beck DE, Jorgensen CD, 1963b. Biotic communities of the Nevada test site. Brigham Young Univ. Sci. Bull. Biol. Ser 2 (2), 1.