Concordance of randomised controlled trials for artificial intelligence interventions with the CONSORT-AI reporting guidelines
- PMID: 38388497
- PMCID: PMC10883966
- DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45355-3
Concordance of randomised controlled trials for artificial intelligence interventions with the CONSORT-AI reporting guidelines
Erratum in
-
Author Correction: Concordance of randomised controlled trials for artificial intelligence interventions with the CONSORT-AI reporting guidelines.Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 29;15(1):6376. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49956-w. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 39075055 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials extension for Artificial Intelligence interventions (CONSORT-AI) was published in September 2020. Since its publication, several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of AI interventions have been published but their completeness and transparency of reporting is unknown. This systematic review assesses the completeness of reporting of AI RCTs following publication of CONSORT-AI and provides a comprehensive summary of RCTs published in recent years. 65 RCTs were identified, mostly conducted in China (37%) and USA (18%). Median concordance with CONSORT-AI reporting was 90% (IQR 77-94%), although only 10 RCTs explicitly reported its use. Several items were consistently under-reported, including algorithm version, accessibility of the AI intervention or code, and references to a study protocol. Only 3 of 52 included journals explicitly endorsed or mandated CONSORT-AI. Despite a generally high concordance amongst recent AI RCTs, some AI-specific considerations remain systematically poorly reported. Further encouragement of CONSORT-AI adoption by journals and funders may enable more complete adoption of the full CONSORT-AI guidelines.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Several authors (X.L., D.M., A.D., C.K., L.F.R., C.L., A.W.C., M.C., P.K., G.S.C., R.G., L.O.R., M.M., C.Y., S.C.R., A.B.) were involved in the development of CONSORT-AI. MC receives funding from the NIHR, UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), NIHR BRC, the NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, NIHR ARC West Midlands, NIHR Birmingham-Oxford Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics, UKSPINE, European Regional Development Fund – Demand Hub and Health Data Research UK at the University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Innovate UK (part of UKRI), Macmillan Cancer Support, UCB Pharma, GSK and Gilead. M.C. has received personal fees from Astellas, Aparito Ltd, CIS Oncology, Takeda, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, Glaukos, GSK and the Patient-Centred Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) outside the submitted work. X.L. and A.D. have received funding from the NHS AI Lab, The Health Foundation, NIHR, NIHR BRC, MHRA and NICE, outside the submitted work. A.D. and M.C. are supported by the NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. C.K. is an employee of Google, UK. L.F.R. is an employee of York Health Economics Consortium (YHEC). The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension.Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1364-1374. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1034-x. Epub 2020 Sep 9. Nat Med. 2020. PMID: 32908283 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension.Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Oct;2(10):e537-e548. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30218-1. Epub 2020 Sep 9. Lancet Digit Health. 2020. PMID: 33328048 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines.BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 29;4(7):e005068. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005068. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 25079926 Free PMC article.
-
Reporting guidelines for clinical trials of artificial intelligence interventions: the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines.Trials. 2021 Jan 6;22(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04951-6. Trials. 2021. PMID: 33407780 Free PMC article.
-
Reporting of CONSORT flow diagrams for parallel group randomized controlled trials published in orthodontic journals.Eur J Orthod. 2025 Apr 8;47(3):cjaf019. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaf019. Eur J Orthod. 2025. PMID: 40237386
Cited by
-
A framework for human evaluation of large language models in healthcare derived from literature review.NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Sep 28;7(1):258. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01258-7. NPJ Digit Med. 2024. PMID: 39333376 Free PMC article.
-
The testing of AI in medicine is a mess. Here's how it should be done.Nature. 2024 Aug;632(8026):722-724. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-02675-0. Nature. 2024. PMID: 39169244 No abstract available.
-
Using ChatGPT to Improve the Presentation of Plain Language Summaries of Cochrane Systematic Reviews About Oncology Interventions: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 19;11:e63347. doi: 10.2196/63347. JMIR Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40106236 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of artificial intelligence driven therapeutic lifestyle changes (AI-TLC) intervention on health behavior and health among obesity pregnant women in China: a randomized controlled trial protocol.Front Public Health. 2025 May 12;13:1580060. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1580060. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40421363 Free PMC article.
-
A Practical Guide to Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Imaging Models in Scientific Literature.Ophthalmol Sci. 2025 Jun 9;5(6):100847. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2025.100847. eCollection 2025 Nov-Dec. Ophthalmol Sci. 2025. PMID: 40778360 Free PMC article.
References
-
- McKinney, S. M. et al. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature577, 89–94 (2020). - PubMed
-
- Liu, X. et al. A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Digit. Health1, e271–e297 (2019). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources