Assessment of ownership of smart devices and the acceptability of digital health data sharing
- PMID: 38388660
- PMCID: PMC10883993
- DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01030-x
Assessment of ownership of smart devices and the acceptability of digital health data sharing
Abstract
Smart portable devices- smartphones and smartwatches- are rapidly being adopted by the general population, which has brought forward an opportunity to use the large volumes of physiological, behavioral, and activity data continuously being collected by these devices in naturalistic settings to perform research, monitor health, and track disease. While these data can serve to revolutionize health monitoring in research and clinical care, minimal research has been conducted to understand what motivates people to use these devices and their interest and comfort in sharing the data. In this study, we aimed to characterize the ownership and usage of smart devices among patients from an expansive academic health system in the southeastern US and understand their willingness to share data collected by the smart devices. We conducted an electronic survey of participants from an online patient advisory group around smart device ownership, usage, and data sharing. Out of the 3021 members of the online patient advisory group, 1368 (45%) responded to the survey, with 871 female (64%), 826 and 390 White (60%) and Black (29%) participants, respectively, and a slight majority (52%) age 58 and older. Most of the respondents (98%) owned a smartphone and the majority (59%) owned a wearable. In this population, people who identify as female, Hispanic, and Generation Z (age 18-25), and those completing higher education and having full-time employment, were most likely to own a wearable device compared to their demographic counterparts. 50% of smart device owners were willing to share and 32% would consider sharing their smart device data for research purposes. The type of activity data they are willing to share varies by gender, age, education, and employment. Findings from this study can be used to design both equitable and cost-effective digital health studies, leveraging personally-owned smartphones and wearables in representative populations, ultimately enabling the development of equitable digital health technologies.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
J.P.D is a Scientific Advisor for Veri, Inc. at the time of data collection and writing. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Usage Trends and Data Sharing Practices of Healthcare Wearable Devices Among US Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 21;27:e63879. doi: 10.2196/63879. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 39982763 Free PMC article.
-
Patterns of Ownership and Usage of Wearable Devices in the United States, 2020-2022: Survey Study.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 26;26:e56504. doi: 10.2196/56504. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39058548 Free PMC article.
-
Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 2;20(5):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9388. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 29720359 Free PMC article.
-
State of the Art in Smart Portable, Wearable, Ingestible and Implantable Devices for Health Status Monitoring and Disease Management.Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 1;22(11):4228. doi: 10.3390/s22114228. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35684847 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of smart gadgets/wearable devices in detecting atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jan;114(1):4-16. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 Sep 10. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2021. PMID: 32921618
Cited by
-
LLMonFHIR: A Physician-Validated, Large Language Model-Based Mobile Application for Querying Patient Electronic Health Data.JACC Adv. 2025 Jun;4(6 Pt 1):101780. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101780. Epub 2025 May 14. JACC Adv. 2025. PMID: 40373519 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of postural orientation on body composition and total body water estimates produced by smartwatch bioelectrical impedance analysis: an intra- and inter-device evaluation.J Electr Bioimpedance. 2024 Aug 5;15(1):89-98. doi: 10.2478/joeb-2024-0010. eCollection 2024 Jan. J Electr Bioimpedance. 2024. PMID: 39105154 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-evaluation of wearable data for use in Parkinson's disease research: a free-living observational study on Empatica E4, Fitbit Sense, and Oura.Biomed Eng Online. 2025 Feb 21;24(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12938-025-01353-0. Biomed Eng Online. 2025. PMID: 39985029 Free PMC article.
-
Usage Trends and Data Sharing Practices of Healthcare Wearable Devices Among US Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 21;27:e63879. doi: 10.2196/63879. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 39982763 Free PMC article.
-
The rise of unmanned gyms: innovation, spatiotemporal characteristics, and the future of urban fitness.Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jul 3;7:1574966. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1574966. eCollection 2025. Front Sports Act Living. 2025. PMID: 40677623 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- NW, 1615 L. St, Washington, S. 800 & Inquiries, D. 20036 U.-419-4300 | M.-857-8562 | F.-419-4372 | M. Mobile Fact Sheet. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Techhttps://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/.
-
- U.S. wearable devices ownership by age 2021. Statistahttps://www.statista.com/statistics/1310364/wearable-devices-ownership-a....
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources