Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;32(4):652-661.
doi: 10.1002/erv.3079. Epub 2024 Feb 22.

Let's get aligned! Developing a core outcome set for clinical trials in eating disorders

Affiliations

Let's get aligned! Developing a core outcome set for clinical trials in eating disorders

Anna Victoria Brieva-Toloza et al. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Our study aimed to review the outcome measures/assessment instruments used and to assess their heterogeneity/homogeneity in eating disorders (EDs) randomised controlled trials.

Methods: APA PsycInfo, PubMed, and Embase were searched in December 2022 to identify studies published between and inclusive of January 2012 and December 2022. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were: (1) complete articles published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, which were: (2) randomised trials, (3) in a clinical setting (4) with human subjects, (5) with an ICD or DSM diagnosis of Anorexia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder, or Bulimia Nervosa. The selected papers also: (6) used one or more standardised instruments designed to measure one or more psychometric characteristics associated with ED as a primary or secondary outcome, as judged by the authors of this systematic review, and (7) were published in English or Danish.

Results: Ninety one articles were included, and a total of 196 outcome measures were collected.

Discussion: The diversity of outcome measures in ED trials hampers result comparability and data integration. We suggest creating a core outcome measure set using the Delphi method, including clinician and patient-reported ED assessments, along with relevant comorbidity scales.

Keywords: assessment instruments; core outcome measure; eating disorder; randomised controlled trials; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. American Psychiatric Association Division of Research. (2014). Highlights of changes from DSM‐IV to DSM‐5: Feeding and eating disorders. FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry, 12(4), 414–415. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.120408
    1. Austin, A., De Silva, U., Ilesanmi, C., Likitabhorn, T., Miller, I., Luz Sousa Fialho, M. d., Austin, S. B., Caldwell, B., Chua, S. N., Dooley‐Hash, S., Downs, J., El Khazen Hadati, C., Herpertz‐Dahlmann, B., Lampert, J., Latzer, Y., Machado, P. P. P., Maguire, S., Malik, M., & Elaine Chew, C. S. (2023). International consensus on patient‐centred outcomes in eating disorders. The Lancet, 10(12), 966–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215‐0366(23)00265‐1
    1. Barkham, M., Evans, C., Margison, F., Mcgrath, G., Mellor‐Clark, J., Milne, D., & Connell, J. (1998). The rationale for developing and implementing core outcome batteries for routine use in service settings and psychotherapy outcome research. Journal of Mental Health, 7(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638239818328
    1. Bryant, E., Broomfield, C., Burrows, J., McLean, S., Marks, P., Maloney, D., Touyz, S., & Maguire, S. (2023). Gaining consensus on clinical quality outcomes for eating disorders: Framework for the development of an Australian national minimum dataset. BMJ Open, 13(4), e071150. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen‐2022‐071150
    1. Fairweather‐Schmidt, A., & Wade, T. D. (2014). DSM‐5 eating disorders and other specified eating and feeding disorders: Is there a meaningful differentiation? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47(5), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22257

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources