Let's get aligned! Developing a core outcome set for clinical trials in eating disorders
- PMID: 38389169
- DOI: 10.1002/erv.3079
Let's get aligned! Developing a core outcome set for clinical trials in eating disorders
Abstract
Objective: Our study aimed to review the outcome measures/assessment instruments used and to assess their heterogeneity/homogeneity in eating disorders (EDs) randomised controlled trials.
Methods: APA PsycInfo, PubMed, and Embase were searched in December 2022 to identify studies published between and inclusive of January 2012 and December 2022. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were: (1) complete articles published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, which were: (2) randomised trials, (3) in a clinical setting (4) with human subjects, (5) with an ICD or DSM diagnosis of Anorexia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder, or Bulimia Nervosa. The selected papers also: (6) used one or more standardised instruments designed to measure one or more psychometric characteristics associated with ED as a primary or secondary outcome, as judged by the authors of this systematic review, and (7) were published in English or Danish.
Results: Ninety one articles were included, and a total of 196 outcome measures were collected.
Discussion: The diversity of outcome measures in ED trials hampers result comparability and data integration. We suggest creating a core outcome measure set using the Delphi method, including clinician and patient-reported ED assessments, along with relevant comorbidity scales.
Keywords: assessment instruments; core outcome measure; eating disorder; randomised controlled trials; systematic review.
© 2024 The Authors. European Eating Disorders Review published by Eating Disorders Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- American Psychiatric Association Division of Research. (2014). Highlights of changes from DSM‐IV to DSM‐5: Feeding and eating disorders. FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry, 12(4), 414–415. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.120408
-
- Austin, A., De Silva, U., Ilesanmi, C., Likitabhorn, T., Miller, I., Luz Sousa Fialho, M. d., Austin, S. B., Caldwell, B., Chua, S. N., Dooley‐Hash, S., Downs, J., El Khazen Hadati, C., Herpertz‐Dahlmann, B., Lampert, J., Latzer, Y., Machado, P. P. P., Maguire, S., Malik, M., & Elaine Chew, C. S. (2023). International consensus on patient‐centred outcomes in eating disorders. The Lancet, 10(12), 966–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215‐0366(23)00265‐1
-
- Barkham, M., Evans, C., Margison, F., Mcgrath, G., Mellor‐Clark, J., Milne, D., & Connell, J. (1998). The rationale for developing and implementing core outcome batteries for routine use in service settings and psychotherapy outcome research. Journal of Mental Health, 7(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638239818328
-
- Bryant, E., Broomfield, C., Burrows, J., McLean, S., Marks, P., Maloney, D., Touyz, S., & Maguire, S. (2023). Gaining consensus on clinical quality outcomes for eating disorders: Framework for the development of an Australian national minimum dataset. BMJ Open, 13(4), e071150. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen‐2022‐071150
-
- Fairweather‐Schmidt, A., & Wade, T. D. (2014). DSM‐5 eating disorders and other specified eating and feeding disorders: Is there a meaningful differentiation? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47(5), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22257
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical