Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 16:69:102484.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102484. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of cardiovascular events: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

Affiliations

Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of cardiovascular events: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

Yang Qu et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: Ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption continues to increase worldwide. However, evidences from meta-analyses are limited regarding the effects on cardiovascular events (CVEs).

Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to assess the dose-response relationship of UPF consumption and CVEs risk (including the morbidity and mortality of cardiovascular causes, and myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, coronary intervention). Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched for observational studies published in English language up to October 24, 2023. Generalized least squares regression and restricted cubic splines were used to estimate the linear/nonlinear relationship. PROSPERO CRD 42023391122.

Findings: Twenty studies with 1,101,073 participants and 58,201 CVEs cases with a median follow-up of 12.2 years were included. A positive linear relationship between UPF intake and CVEs risk was identified. In addition, positive correlation between coronary heart disease and UPF consumption in terms of daily serving and daily energy proportion. No significant association of UPF consumption with the risk of cerebrovascular disease was observed. Briefly, 10% increase of UPF by daily weight proportion was associated with a 1.9% increase of CVEs risk (RR = 1.019; 95% CI, 1.007-1.031; P = 0.002), an additional daily serving corresponding to 2.2% CVEs risk increase (RR = 1.022; 95% CI, 1.013-1.031; P < 0.001), and 10% increase by daily energy proportion corresponding to 1.6% CVEs risk increase (RR = 1.016; 95% CI, 1.002-1.030; P = 0.022).

Interpretation: UPF consumption were associated with a higher risk of CVEs in the positive linear relationship. Our findings highlight the importance of minimizing UPF consumption for cardiovascular health and might be help to pursue public health policies in control of UPF consumption.

Funding: This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province (2023-ZDLSF-22), the Innovative Talent Support Program of Shaanxi Province (2022KJXX-106), and the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province (2023-YBSF-424).

Keywords: Cardiovascular events; Coronary heart disease; Dose–response; Meta-analysis; Risk; Ultra-processed food.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study selection process of ultra-processed food consumption and risk of cardiovascular events.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of the association between the highest level of ultra-processed food consumption by daily weight proportion and risk of cardiovascular events compared to the lowest level (A); Forest plot of the association between the second highest level of ultra-processed food consumption by daily weight proportion and risk of cardiovascular events compared to the lowest level (B); Forest plot of the association between the third highest level of UPF consumption by daily weight proportion and risk of cardiovascular events compared to the lowest level (C); Dose–response association between ultra-processed food consumption by daily weight proportion and risk of cardiovascular events (D). Abbreviations: RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CHD, coronary heart disease; UPF, ultra-processed food; CVEs, cardiovascular events.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of the association between the highest level of ultra-processed food consumption by daily servings and risk of coronary heart disease compared to the lowest level (A); Forest plot of the association between the second highest level of ultra-processed food consumption by daily servings and risk of coronary heart disease compared to the lowest level (B); Forest plot of the association between the third highest level of ultra-processed food consumption by daily servings and risk of coronary heart disease compared to the lowest level (C); Forest plot of the association between the highest level of ultra-processed food consumption by daily energy proportion and risk of coronary heart disease compared to the lowest level (D); Forest plot of the association between the second highest level of ultra-processed food consumption by daily energy proportion and risk of coronary heart disease compared to the lowest level (E); Forest plot of the association between the third highest level of ultra-processed food consumption by daily energy proportion and risk of coronary heart disease compared to the lowest level (F); Dose–response association between ultra-processed food consumption by daily servings and risk of coronary heart disease (G); Dose–response association between ultra-processed food consumption by daily energy proportion and risk of coronary heart disease (H). −/−: not reported in the original article. Abbreviations: CHD, coronary heart disease; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; UPF, ultra-processed food.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Townsend N., Kazakiewicz D., Lucy Wright F., et al. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in Europe. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022;19:133–143. - PubMed
    1. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1736–1788. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:1204–1222. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mozaffarian D. Dietary and policy priorities for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and obesity: a comprehensive review. Circulation. 2016;133:187–225. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dai H., Much A.A., Maor E., et al. Global, regional, and national burden of ischaemic heart disease and its attributable risk factors, 1990-2017: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022;8:50–60. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources