Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb 8:15:1330712.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1330712. eCollection 2024.

Update on the advances and challenges in bioequivalence testing methods for complex topical generic products

Affiliations
Review

Update on the advances and challenges in bioequivalence testing methods for complex topical generic products

Nedaa Alomari et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Most of the government regulatory agencies, including the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency, demand that the generic complex topical products prove pharmaceutical and bioequivalence. The evaluation of bioequivalence for complex topical dermatological formulations is a challenging task that requires careful consideration of several factors. Although comparative clinical studies are still considered the gold standard approach for establishing bioequivalence in most formulations, these studies can be costly and insensitive to detect formulation differences. Therefore, significant efforts have been made to develop and validate alternative approaches that demonstrate bioequivalence and expedite the availability of high-quality generic topical dermatological products. This article reviews the current methods for determining the bioequivalence of topical formulations in humans, with particular emphasis on recent advances in these methodologies. Most of the alternative methods are sensitive and reproducible, with the capability to ease the financial burden of comparative clinical studies within a short delivery time. The limitations associated with each technique are reviewed in detail.

Keywords: bioequivalence; biowaiver; generic; testing methods; topical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Topical drug classification system (Shah et al., 2015).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aiache J., Lafaye C., Bouzat J., Rabier R. (1980). Evaluation de la disponibilite topique des corticoides par thermographie. Belg. J.Pharm. - PubMed
    1. ANDA Abbreviated New Drug Application. 200675.
    1. Andersen P., Milioni K., Maibach H. (1993). The cutaneous corticosteroid vasoconstriction assay: a reflectance spectroscopic and laser‐Doppler flowmetric study. Br. J. Dermatology 128 (6), 660–665. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1993.tb00262.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson C., Andersson T., Molander M. (1991). Ethanol absorption across human skin measured by in vivo microdialysis technique. Acta dermato-venereologica 71 (5), 389–393. 10.2340/0001555571389393 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ao X., Stenken J. A. (2006). Microdialysis sampling of cytokines. Methods 38 (4), 331–341. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.11.012 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources