Update on the advances and challenges in bioequivalence testing methods for complex topical generic products
- PMID: 38389924
- PMCID: PMC10881717
- DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1330712
Update on the advances and challenges in bioequivalence testing methods for complex topical generic products
Abstract
Most of the government regulatory agencies, including the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency, demand that the generic complex topical products prove pharmaceutical and bioequivalence. The evaluation of bioequivalence for complex topical dermatological formulations is a challenging task that requires careful consideration of several factors. Although comparative clinical studies are still considered the gold standard approach for establishing bioequivalence in most formulations, these studies can be costly and insensitive to detect formulation differences. Therefore, significant efforts have been made to develop and validate alternative approaches that demonstrate bioequivalence and expedite the availability of high-quality generic topical dermatological products. This article reviews the current methods for determining the bioequivalence of topical formulations in humans, with particular emphasis on recent advances in these methodologies. Most of the alternative methods are sensitive and reproducible, with the capability to ease the financial burden of comparative clinical studies within a short delivery time. The limitations associated with each technique are reviewed in detail.
Keywords: bioequivalence; biowaiver; generic; testing methods; topical.
Copyright © 2024 Alomari and Alhussaini.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Therapeutic-driven framework for bioequivalence assessment of complex topical generic drug products.Int J Pharm. 2024 Aug 15;661:124398. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124398. Epub 2024 Jul 2. Int J Pharm. 2024. PMID: 38964491 Review.
-
Bioequivalence of topical generic products. Part 2. Paving the way to a tailored regulatory system.Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018 Sep 15;122:264-272. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Jul 4. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018. PMID: 29981406 Review.
-
Advances in in-vitro bioequivalence testing methods for complex ophthalmic generic products.Int J Pharm. 2022 Nov 5;627:122209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122209. Epub 2022 Sep 24. Int J Pharm. 2022. PMID: 36162609 Review.
-
Pharmacokinetics-Based Approaches for Bioequivalence Evaluation of Topical Dermatological Drug Products.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015 Nov;54(11):1095-106. doi: 10.1007/s40262-015-0292-0. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015. PMID: 26063051 Review.
-
Progress in methodologies for evaluating bioequivalence of topical formulations.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2001;2(5):275-80. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200102050-00001. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2001. PMID: 11721645
Cited by
-
From In Vivo Predictive Dissolution to Virtual Bioequivalence: A GastroPlus®-Driven Framework for Generic Candesartan Cilexetil Tablets.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Apr 11;18(4):562. doi: 10.3390/ph18040562. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40283997 Free PMC article.
-
Regulation for the Bioequivalence Evaluation of Generic Topical Dermatological Drug Products in Japan.Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2025 Jul;50(4):353-361. doi: 10.1007/s13318-025-00952-5. Epub 2025 Jun 9. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2025. PMID: 40488913
-
Generic orphan drug substitution: a critical analysis of global practices and Saudi Arabia's perspective.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 18;15:1376009. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1376009. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 38698816 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aiache J., Lafaye C., Bouzat J., Rabier R. (1980). Evaluation de la disponibilite topique des corticoides par thermographie. Belg. J.Pharm. - PubMed
-
- ANDA Abbreviated New Drug Application. 200675.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources