Intubation Decision Based on Illness Severity and Mortality in COVID-19: An International Study
- PMID: 38391282
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006229
Intubation Decision Based on Illness Severity and Mortality in COVID-19: An International Study
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of intubation timing, guided by severity criteria, on mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients, amidst existing uncertainties regarding optimal intubation practices.
Design: Prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted from February 1, 2020, to November 1, 2022.
Setting: Ten academic institutions in the United States and Europe.
Patients: Adults (≥ 18 yr old) confirmed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and hospitalized specifically for COVID-19, requiring intubation postadmission. Exclusion criteria included patients hospitalized for non-COVID-19 reasons despite a positive SARS-CoV-2 test.
Interventions: Early invasive mechanical ventilation (EIMV) was defined as intubation in patients with less severe organ dysfunction (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] < 7 or Pa o2 /F io2 ratio > 250), whereas late invasive mechanical ventilation (LIMV) was defined as intubation in patients with SOFA greater than or equal to 7 and Pa o2 /F io2 ratio less than or equal to 250.
Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was mortality within 30 days of hospital admission. Among 4464 patients, 854 (19.1%) required mechanical ventilation (mean age 60 yr, 61.7% male, 19.3% Black). Of those, 621 (72.7%) were categorized in the EIMV group and 233 (27.3%) in the LIMV group. Death within 30 days after admission occurred in 278 patients (42.2%) in the EIMV and 88 patients (46.6%) in the LIMV group ( p = 0.28). An inverse probability-of-treatment weighting analysis revealed a statistically significant association with mortality, with patients in the EIMV group being 32% less likely to die either within 30 days of admission (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90; p = 0.008) or within 30 days after intubation irrespective of its timing from admission (adjusted HR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.90; p = 0.006).
Conclusions: In severe COVID-19 cases, an early intubation strategy, guided by specific severity criteria, is associated with a reduced risk of death. These findings underscore the importance of timely intervention based on objective severity assessments.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04818866.
Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Hayek is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 1R01HL153384-01, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) 1R01DK12801201A1, U01-DK119083-03S1, and the Frankel Cardiovascular Center COVID-19: Impact Research Ignitor (U-M G024231) award. Dr. Pop-Busui is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/NIDDK-1-R01-DK-107956-01, NIH U01 DK119083, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation 5-COE-2019-861-S-B, and by a Pilot and Feasibility Grant from the Michigan Diabetes Research Center (NIH Grant P30-DK020572). Dr. Huang disclosed work for hire. Dr. Giamarellos-Bourboulis’ institution received funding from Abbott Products Operations AG, BioMerieux, and MSD; they received funding from Abbott CH, BioMérieux, Brahms GmbH, GSK, InflaRx GmbH, Sobi, XBiotech, AbbVie, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Novartis, UCB, and from the Horizon2020 Marie-Curie Project European Sepsis Academy, the Horizon 2020 European Grants ImmunoSep and RISKinCOVID, and from the Horizon Europe project EPIC-CROWN-2. Drs. Reiser and Banerjee received support for article research from the NIH. Dr. Reiser disclosed they are a co-founder and co-chair of the Scientific Advisory Board of Walden Biosciences; they received support for article research from Rush University Medical Center. Dr. Banerjee’s institution received funding from the NIDDK; they received funding from Novo Nordisk, Roche, and Lexicon Pharmaceuticals. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Intubation in COVID-19: When Severity and Trajectory Collide.Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun 1;52(6):990-992. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006246. Epub 2024 May 16. Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 38752819 No abstract available.
References
-
- Krishnan JK, Rajan M, Baer BR, et al.: Assessing mortality differences across acute respiratory failure management strategies in COVID-19. J Crit Care. 2022; 70:154045
-
- Berlin DA, Gulick RM, Martinez FJ: Severe COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383:2451–2460
-
- Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, et al.; COVID-19 Lombardy ICU Network: Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. JAMA. 2020; 323:1574–1581
-
- Ji Y, Ma Z, Peppelenbosch MP, et al.: Potential association between COVID-19 mortality and health-care resource availability. Lancet Glob Health. 2020; 8:e480
-
- Zuo MZ, Huang YG, Ma WH, Xue Z-G, Zhang J-Q, Gong Y-H, Che L, Airway Management Chinese Society of Anesthesiology Task Force on; Chinese Society of Anesthesiology Task Force on Airway Management: Expert recommendations for tracheal intubation in critically ill patients with noval coronavirus disease 2019. Chin Med Sci J. 2020; 35:105–109
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous