Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 6;12(4):420.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare12040420.

Development and Psychometric Validation of the Breast Cancer Stigma Assessment Scale for Women with Breast Cancer and Its Survivors

Affiliations

Development and Psychometric Validation of the Breast Cancer Stigma Assessment Scale for Women with Breast Cancer and Its Survivors

Judit Cenit-García et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The increase in breast cancer cases and breast cancer survival makes it advisable to quantify the impact of the health-related stigma of this disease.

Purpose/objectives: To develop and validate a breast cancer stigma scale in Spanish.

Methods: Women diagnosed with, or survivors of, breast cancer were included. The development of the Breast Cancer Stigma Assessment Scale (BCSAS) involved both a literature review and personal interviews. Content validity was assessed using a Delphi study and a pilot test; construct validity was evaluated using an exploratory factor analysis; and convergent validity was assessed using six scales. Cronbach's α internal consistency and test-retest reliability were used to determine the reliability of the scales.

Results: 231 women responded to the 28-item scale. The BCSAS showed good reliability, with α = 0.897. Seven factors emerged: concealment (α = 0.765), disturbance (α = 0.772), internalized stigma (α = 0.750), aesthetics (α = 0.779), course (α = 0.599), danger (α = 0.502), and origin (α = 0.350). The test-retest reliability was 0.830 (p < 0.001). Significant correlation was observed with event centrality (r = 0.701), anxiety-depression (r = 0.668), shame (r = 0.645), guilt (r = 0.524), and quality of life (r = -0.545).

Conclusions: The BCSAS is a reliable and valid measure of stigma in women with breast cancer and its survivors. It could be useful for detecting stigma risk and establishing psychotherapeutic and care priorities.

Keywords: breast neoplasm; cancer; cancer survivors; patients; social stigma; validation study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fujisawa and Hagiwara’s conceptual model of cancer stigma [15]. A: The presence of cancer in itself is not always considered as a stigma, particularly when it does not convey a deviation from the norm and/or is not associated with undesirable qualities. B: The presence of cancer, once labeled as a stigma, can induce negative reactions among the general population toward the patients. C: Negative reactions from others can impact patient health status as well as health-related behaviors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Wagle N.S., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2023;73:17–48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allahqoli L., Mazidimoradi A., Momenimovahed Z., Rahmani A., Hakimi S., Tiznobaik A., Gharacheh M., Salehiniya H., Babaey F., Alkatout I. The Global Incidence, Mortality, and Burden of Breast Cancer in 2019: Correlation with Smoking, Drinking, and Drug Use. Front. Oncol. 2022;12:921015. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.921015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM) Las Cifras del Cáncer en España. 1st ed. SEOM Fundación; Madrid, Spain: 2023.
    1. Chávez-Díaz A., Gómez-González M.d.P., Torres-López T.M. Social Representations of Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Women with Recent Diagnosis and Healthy Women. Actual. Psicol. 2020;34:51–67.
    1. Palacios-Espinosa X., Zani B. La Stigmatisation de La Maladie Physique: Le Cas Du Cancer. Psycho-Oncol. 2012;6:189–200. doi: 10.1007/s11839-012-0391-1. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources