Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan 23;31(2):629-648.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol31020046.

Preparing for and Not Waiting for Surgery

Affiliations
Review

Preparing for and Not Waiting for Surgery

Andrew Bates et al. Curr Oncol. .

Abstract

Cancer surgery is an essential treatment strategy but can disrupt patients' physical and psychological health. With worldwide demand for surgery expected to increase, this review aims to raise awareness of this global public health concern, present a stepwise framework for preoperative risk evaluation, and propose the adoption of personalised prehabilitation to mitigate risk. Perioperative medicine is a growing speciality that aims to improve clinical outcome by preparing patients for the stress associated with surgery. Preparation should begin at contemplation of surgery, with universal screening for established risk factors, physical fitness, nutritional status, psychological health, and, where applicable, frailty and cognitive function. Patients at risk should undergo a formal assessment with a qualified healthcare professional which informs meaningful shared decision-making discussion and personalised prehabilitation prescription incorporating, where indicated, exercise, nutrition, psychological support, 'surgery schools', and referral to existing local services. The foundational principles of prehabilitation can be adapted to local context, culture, and population. Clinical services should be co-designed with all stakeholders, including patient representatives, and require careful mapping of patient pathways and use of multi-disciplinary professional input. Future research should optimise prehabilitation interventions, adopting standardised outcome measures and robust health economic evaluation.

Keywords: cancer surgery; cognitive; exercise; functional capacity; nutrition; perioperative medicine; physical fitness; prehabilitation; psychology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the differential health trajectories related to adherence to prehabilitation prior to surgery. The cancer care continuum begins at the point of diagnosis and contemplation of surgery. While the health system works through necessary diagnostic and administrative processes, the patient can begin to prepare to face the metabolic stress of surgery. Those who arrive at the operating theatre physically fit, nutritionally replete, and psychologically prepared are likely to suffer less severe response to surgical stress, recover more quickly and more fully, and regain previous or improved functional capacity and quality of life in the longer-term postoperative period.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the proposed framework for optimal preparation prior to surgery. The period between diagnosis and surgery can be repurposed from waiting time to preparation time. This is reliant upon early screening for risk and targeted assessment, informing meaningful shared decision-making, surgical education, and personalised prehabilitation prescription, underpinned by behaviour change, established medical management, and enhanced recovery techniques.

References

    1. Sullivan R., Alatise O.I., Anderson B.O., Audisio R., Autier P., Aggarwal A., Sullivan R., Alatise O.I., Anderson B.O., Audisio R., et al. Global cancer surgery: Delivering safe, affordable, and timely cancer surgery. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1193–1224. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00223-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. International Surgical Outcomes Study Group TISOS Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: Prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Br. J. Anaesth. 2016;117:601–609. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew316. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Resio B.J., Gonsalves L., Canavan M., Mueller L., Phillips C., Sathe T., Swett K., Boffa D.J. Where the Other Half Dies: Analysis of Mortalities Occurring More Than 30 Days after Complex Cancer Surgery. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2021;28:1278–1286. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09080-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meara J.G., Greenberg S.L. The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery Global surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare and economic development. Surgery. 2015;157:834–835. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pearse R.M., Moreno R.P., Bauer P., Pelosi P., Metnitz P., Spies C., Vallet B., Vincent J.L., Hoeft A., Rhodes A., et al. Mortality after surgery in Europe: A 7 day cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380:1059–1065. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61148-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types