BCG and Alternative Therapies to BCG Therapy for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
- PMID: 38392073
- PMCID: PMC10888316
- DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31020079
BCG and Alternative Therapies to BCG Therapy for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Abstract
Bladder cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Treatment decisions are mostly decided based on disease stage (non-muscle invasive or muscle invasive). Patients with muscle-invasive disease will be offered a radical treatment combined with systemic therapy, while in those with non-muscle-invasive disease, an attempt to resect the tumor endoscopically will usually be followed by different intravesical instillations. The goal of intravesical therapy is to decrease the recurrence and/or progression of the tumor. In the current landscape of bladder cancer treatment, BCG is given intravesically to induce an inflammatory response and recruit immune cells to attack the malignant cells and induce immune memory. While the response to BCG treatment has changed the course of bladder cancer management and spared many "bladders", some patients may develop BCG-unresponsive disease, leaving radical surgery as the best choice of curative treatment. As a result, a lot of effort has been put into identifying novel therapies like systemic pembrolizumab and Nadofaragene-Firadenovac to continue sparing bladders if BCG is ineffective. Moreover, recent logistic issues with BCG production caused a worldwide BCG shortage, re-sparking interest in alternative BCG treatments including mitomycin C, sequential gemcitabine with docetaxel, and others. This review encompasses both the historic and current role of BCG in the treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, revisiting BCG alternative therapies and reviewing the novel therapeutics that were approved for the BCG-unresponsive stage or are under active investigation.
Keywords: BCG; BCG failure; bladder cancer; intravesical therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Osman Y., Elawdy M., Taha D.-E., Zahran M.H., Abouelkheir R.T., Sharaf D.E., Mosbah A., Dein B.A.-E. Bladder perforation as a complication of transurethral resection of bladder tumors: The predictors, management, and its impact in a series of 1570 at a tertiary urology institute. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2023;55:2161–2167. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03638-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gallioli A., Diana P., Fontana M., Territo A., Rodriguez-Faba Ó., Gaya J.M., Sanguedolce F., Huguet J., Mercade A., Piana A., et al. En Bloc Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Noninferiority Trial. Eur. Urol. Oncol. 2022;5:440–448. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.05.001. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mastroianni R., Brassetti A., Krajewski W., Zdrojowy R., Al Salhi Y., Anceschi U., Bove A.M., Carbone A., De Nunzio C., Fuschi A., et al. Assessing the Impact of the Absence of Detrusor Muscle in Ta Low-grade Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder on Recurrence-free Survival. Eur. Urol. Focus. 2021;7:1324–1331. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.007. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
