Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 9;12(2):38.
doi: 10.3390/dj12020038.

A Scoping Review of the Oral Health Status, Oral Health Behaviours and Interventions to Improve the Oral Health of Children and Young People in Care and Care Leavers

Joelle Booth  1   2 , Jo Erwin  2 , Lorna Burns  2 , Nick Axford  3 , Jane Horrell  3 , Hannah Wheat  3 , Robert Witton  2 , Jill Shawe  4 , Janine Doughty  5 , Sarah Kaddour  6 , Skye Boswell  7 , Urshla Devalia  8 , Abigail Nelder  9 , Martha Paisi  2   4
Affiliations

A Scoping Review of the Oral Health Status, Oral Health Behaviours and Interventions to Improve the Oral Health of Children and Young People in Care and Care Leavers

Joelle Booth et al. Dent J (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Children and young people (CYP) in care experience poorer physical health and overall wellbeing in comparison to their peers. Despite this, relatively little is known about what their oral health needs and behaviours are. The aim of this scoping review was to provide a global perspective on the oral health status and behaviours of CYP in care and care leavers. It also aimed to synthesise interventions that have been trialled in this population to improve oral health.

Methods: Five databases were searched, Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), SocINDEX (EBSCOhost) and Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (EBSCOhost), alongside grey literature sources up to January 2023. Eligibility criteria were studies that (i) reported on children and adolescents aged 25 years or younger who are currently in formal/informal foster or residential care and care leavers, (ii) pertained to oral health profile, behaviours or oral health promotion interventions (iii) and were published in the English language. Thematic analysis was used to develop the domains for oral health behaviours and interventions.

Results: Seventy-one papers were included. Most papers were published from very high or medium Human Development Index countries. CYP in care were found to experience high levels of decay, dental trauma, periodontal disease and poorer oral health-related quality of life. Oral health behaviours included limited oral health self-care behaviours and a lack of oral health-based knowledge. The trialled interventions involved oral health education, supervised brushing and treatment or preventative dental care.

Conclusions: This scoping review reveals that CYP in care experience poorer oral health in comparison to their peers. They are also less likely to carry out oral health self-care behaviours. This review highlights a scarcity of interventions to improve the oral health of this population and a paucity of evidence surrounding the oral health needs of care leavers.

Keywords: children looked after; children’s oral health; foster; global oral health; oral health knowledge; oral health related quality of life; oral health status; orphans; unaccompanied refugee asylum minors; vulnerable children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The funders, the Borrow Foundation had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses or interpretation of the data or in the writing of the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart [13].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Publication density based on country and HDI category presented alongside a map of the HDI index of countries globally. (n) represents the number of publications published per country.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Better Care Network The Continuum of Care. 2022. [(accessed on 27 February 2022)]. Available online: https://bettercarenetwork.org/library/the-continuum-of-care.
    1. Delap E., Melville L. Fostering Better Care: Improving Foster Care Provision Around the World, Every Child. 2011. [(accessed on 27 February 2022)]. Available online: https://bettercarenetwork.org/sites/default/files/Fostering%20Better%20C....
    1. United Nations General Assembly, Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children: Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, UN, New York. 2010. [(accessed on 27 February 2022)]. Available online: https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/pdf/5416.pdf/
    1. UNICEF Data: Monitoring the Situation of Children and Women, Children in Alternative Care. 2022. [(accessed on 27 September 2022)]. Available online: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/children-alternative-care/
    1. Murray E.T., Lacey R., Maughan B., Sacker A. Non-parental care in childhood and health up to 30 years later: ONS Longitudinal Study 1971–2011. Eur. J. Public Health. 2020;30:1121–1127. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa113. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources