How an agreement with restriction of unhealthy food marketing and sodium taxation influenced high fat, salt or sugar (HFSS) food consumption
- PMID: 38395859
- PMCID: PMC10885404
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18069-w
How an agreement with restriction of unhealthy food marketing and sodium taxation influenced high fat, salt or sugar (HFSS) food consumption
Abstract
Background: Food taxation and food marketing policy are very cost-effectiveness to improve healthy diets among children. The objective of this study was to investigate the socio-demographic characteristics of Thais and attitude towards on policy unhealthy food marketing restriction and sodium taxation which influence high fat, sodium, and sugar (FHSS) food eating.
Methods: The data were obtained from the 2021 Health Behavior of Population Survey, four-stage sampling method of the Thai people, aged 15 years and above, using a offline survey application-assisted face-to-face interview. Logistic Regression were used to analyze the explanatory variables on agreement and HFSS food intake.
Results: Almost half (48.4%) of samples disagreed with sodium taxation, and 42.7% of the samples disagreed with food marketing restriction. Most (99.6%) of Thai respondents consumed HFSS food, including sugar sweetened beverages (SSB). Gender, age, education, income, BMI, and health status were associated with agreement with food marketing restriction policy and sodium taxation policy. There is no association between agreement with policy on sodium taxation and food marketing and HFSS food consumption.
Conclusion: Nearly half of Thais indicated that they disagreed with policy on food marketing restriction and sodium taxation. Therefore, understanding and awareness of the two policies among Thais should be further investigated in order to develop better policy communication for increased public understanding and engagement.
Keywords: Agreement; Food marketing restriction; Policy; Sodium taxation; Thais.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Should We Worry About Spillover Effects of Sugar Sweetened Beverage Taxation Policies? Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7793. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7793. Epub 2023 Jun 6. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023. PMID: 37579383 Free PMC article.
-
Are Australians ready for warning labels, marketing bans and sugary drink taxes? Two cross-sectional surveys measuring support for policy responses to sugar-sweetened beverages.BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 27;9(6):e027962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027962. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31248926 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of multigenerational and living-alone households on high fat, sugar or sodium (HFSS) food consumption pattern in aging population.Appetite. 2025 Jan 1;204:107731. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107731. Epub 2024 Oct 24. Appetite. 2025. PMID: 39461481
-
Insights on the Influence of Sugar Taxes on Obesity Prevention Efforts.Curr Nutr Rep. 2019 Dec;8(4):333-339. doi: 10.1007/s13668-019-00282-4. Curr Nutr Rep. 2019. PMID: 31177469 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nutrition related non-communicable diseases and sugar sweetened beverage policies: a landscape analysis in Zambia.Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1872172. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1872172. Glob Health Action. 2021. PMID: 33876714 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Self-Care Behaviors of Patients With Heart Failure in Thailand: A qualitative descriptive study.J Transcult Nurs. 2025 Mar 14;36(5):10436596251323269. doi: 10.1177/10436596251323269. Online ahead of print. J Transcult Nurs. 2025. PMID: 40083196 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Obesity Geneva: World Health Organization.; 2021 [Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/facts-in-pictures/detail/6-facts-on-obesity.
-
- Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017., et al. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1923–94. - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources