Comparison of the formula accuracy for calculating multifocal intraocular lens power: a single center retrospective study in Korean patients
- PMID: 38396107
- PMCID: PMC10891126
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54889-x
Comparison of the formula accuracy for calculating multifocal intraocular lens power: a single center retrospective study in Korean patients
Abstract
This study evaluated the accuracy of newer formulas (Barrett Universal II, EVO 2.0, Kane, Hoffer QST, and PEARL-DGS) and the Haigis formula in Korean patients with the Alcon TFNT multifocal intraocular lens. In total, 3100 randomly selected eyes of 3100 patients were retrospectively reviewed. After constant optimization, the standard deviation (SD) of the prediction error was assessed for the entire group, and the root mean square error was compared for short and long axial length (AL) subgroup analysis. The Cooke-modified AL (CMAL) was experimentally applied to the Haigis formula. All the newer formulas performed well, but they did not significantly outperform the Haigis formula. In addition, all the newer formulas exhibited significant myopic outcomes (- 0.23 to - 0.29 diopters) in long eyes. Application of the CMAL to the Haigis formula with single constant optimization produced similar behavior and higher correlation with the newer formulas. The CMAL-applied triple-optimized Haigis formula yielded a substantially smaller SD, even superior to the Barrett and Hoffer QST formulas. The AL modification algorithms such as the CMAL used in newer formulas to cope with optical biometry's overestimation of the AL in long eyes seemed to overcompensate, particularly in the long eyes of the East Asian population.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Investigation of the myopic outcomes of the newer intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Korean patients with long eyes.Sci Rep. 2024 May 31;14(1):12558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63334-y. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38822089 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of Modern Intraocular Lens Formulas in Highly Myopic Eyes Implanted With Plate-Haptic Intraocular Lenses.Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep;265:105-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 May 3. Am J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38703800
-
Accuracy of Modern IOL Power Calculation Formulas in Eyes After Myopic Laser Vision Correction: A Stratified Axial Length Analysis.J Refract Surg. 2025 May;41(5):e435-e443. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20250328-01. Epub 2025 May 1. J Refract Surg. 2025. PMID: 40340674
-
Recent developments in the intraocular lens formulae: An update.Semin Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;38(2):143-150. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2022.2094712. Epub 2022 Jul 1. Semin Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 35776680 Review.
-
Comparing the accuracy of new intraocular lens power calculation formulae in short eyes after cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun;42(6):1939-1956. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-02191-4. Epub 2022 Jan 26. Int Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35080690
Cited by
-
Impact of the Minimization of Standard Deviation Before Zeroization of the Mean Bias on the Performance of IOL Power Formulas.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Oct 1;13(10):22. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.10.22. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024. PMID: 39392436 Free PMC article.
-
Investigation of the myopic outcomes of the newer intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Korean patients with long eyes.Sci Rep. 2024 May 31;14(1):12558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63334-y. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38822089 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources