Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 23;14(1):4462.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54889-x.

Comparison of the formula accuracy for calculating multifocal intraocular lens power: a single center retrospective study in Korean patients

Affiliations

Comparison of the formula accuracy for calculating multifocal intraocular lens power: a single center retrospective study in Korean patients

Jinchul Kim et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This study evaluated the accuracy of newer formulas (Barrett Universal II, EVO 2.0, Kane, Hoffer QST, and PEARL-DGS) and the Haigis formula in Korean patients with the Alcon TFNT multifocal intraocular lens. In total, 3100 randomly selected eyes of 3100 patients were retrospectively reviewed. After constant optimization, the standard deviation (SD) of the prediction error was assessed for the entire group, and the root mean square error was compared for short and long axial length (AL) subgroup analysis. The Cooke-modified AL (CMAL) was experimentally applied to the Haigis formula. All the newer formulas performed well, but they did not significantly outperform the Haigis formula. In addition, all the newer formulas exhibited significant myopic outcomes (- 0.23 to - 0.29 diopters) in long eyes. Application of the CMAL to the Haigis formula with single constant optimization produced similar behavior and higher correlation with the newer formulas. The CMAL-applied triple-optimized Haigis formula yielded a substantially smaller SD, even superior to the Barrett and Hoffer QST formulas. The AL modification algorithms such as the CMAL used in newer formulas to cope with optical biometry's overestimation of the AL in long eyes seemed to overcompensate, particularly in the long eyes of the East Asian population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean prediction error plotted against the axial length groups of each formula. AL axial length, CMAL Cooke-modified axial length, D diopter, HSAL Haigis formula, single-optimized and AL-applied, HSCL Haigis formula, single-optimized and CMAL-applied, HTAL Haigis formula, triple-optimized and AL-applied, HTCL Haigis formula, triple-optimized and CMAL-applied, HQST Hoffer Q/Savini/Taroni formula, PEARL-rCMAL PEARL-DGS formula with reversed CMAL (= [AL + 0.05467 × lens thickness − 1.28353]/0.95855).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of absolute errors of each formula. AL axial length, CMAL Cooke-modified axial length, D diopter, HSAL Haigis formula, single-optimized and AL-applied, HSCL Haigis formula, single-optimized and CMAL-applied, HTAL Haigis formula, triple-optimized and AL-applied, HTCL Haigis formula, triple-optimized and CMAL-applied.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hill WE, Abulafia A, Wang L, Koch DD. Pursuing perfection in IOL calculations. II. Measurement foibles: Measurement errors, validation criteria, IOL constants, and lane length. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2017;43:869–870. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kane JX, Chang DF. Intraocular lens power formulas, biometry, and intraoperative aberrometry: A review. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:e94–e114. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reitblat O, et al. Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2015;43:328–334. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12478. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shammas HJ, Shammas MC, Jivrajka RV, Cooke DL, Potvin R. Effects on IOL power calculation and expected clinical outcomes of axial length measurements based on multiple vs single refractive indices. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2020;14:1511–1519. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S256851. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vrijman V, et al. Evaluation of different IOL calculation formulas of the ASCRS calculator in eyes after corneal refractive laser surgery for myopia with multifocal IOL implantation. J. Refract. Surg. 2019;35:54–59. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20181119-01. - DOI - PubMed