Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 6;13(4):510.
doi: 10.3390/foods13040510.

Minced Beef Meat Paste Characteristics: Gel Properties, Water Distribution, and Microstructures Regulated by Medium Molecular Mass of γ-Poly-Glutamic Acid

Affiliations

Minced Beef Meat Paste Characteristics: Gel Properties, Water Distribution, and Microstructures Regulated by Medium Molecular Mass of γ-Poly-Glutamic Acid

Mengmeng Qiao et al. Foods. .

Abstract

The influences of various m-γ-PGA (0.08-0.20%, w/w) concentrations on the properties of minced beef meat paste in terms of rheological properties, texture, moisture distribution, and microstructures were evaluated. The results indicated that m-γ-PGA enhanced the water-holding capacity, gel strength, texture, and whiteness of the minced beef meat paste. Based on the microstructural results, m-γ-PGA helped form a more organized and compact gel, thereby limiting the migration of water through the gel matrix. In contrast to the control group, the water-holding property, gel strength, and whiteness of minced meat paste gels with m-γ-PGA content of 0.12% increased from 75.89%, 584.51 g·cm, and 61.83 to 79.91%, 780.87 g·cm, and 62.54, respectively (p < 0.05), exhibiting the highest water-holding property and gel strength. Thus, m-γ-PGA exhibits great potential for minced meat paste products as a healthy gel water retainer and enhancer in low-fat meat products.

Keywords: gel property; microstructure; minced beef meat paste; molecular weight; water-holding capacity; γ-poly-glutamic acid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Moisturizing properties of γ-PGA degradation products. Different superscript letters (a–c) indicate significance (at α = 0.05 level); the same below.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of different additions of m-γ-PGA (0.00, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16, and 0.20%) on the storage modulus (a) and tan δ (b) at different frequencies and storage modulus at different temperatures (c) of minced beef meat paste.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of different additions of m-γ-PGA (0.00, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16, and 0.20%) on breaking force and deformation (a) and gel strength (b) of gels prepared from raw minced beef meat paste. Different superscript letters (a–d) indicate significance (at α = 0.05 level).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of different additions of m-γ-PGA (0.00, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16, and 0.20%) on water-holding capacity and cooking loss of minced beef meat paste. Different superscript letters (a–c) indicate significance (at α = 0.05 level).
Figure 5
Figure 5
T2 relaxation time curves (a), T2 relaxation times (b), and T2 percentage content (c) in minced beef meat paste gels with different levels of m-γ-PGA added. The red, yellow, green, blue, and purple curves in Figure 5a represent the T2 relaxation time curves of meat gels with m-γ-PGA content of 0, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16, and 0.20%, respectively. Different superscript letters (a–d) in (b,c) indicate significance (at α = 0.05 level).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Microstructure of beef meat gels at m-γ-PGA concentrations of 0.00, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16, and 0.20% (ae).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Principal component analysis (a) and Pearson’s correlation analysis (b). The arrows in (a) correspond to the loadings of the correlation indicators. The circle size and color gradient in (b) indicate the correlation coefficients (r-value), and the * and ** symbols in (b) represent significant correlation at the significance levels of 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hawley A.L., Liang X., Børsheim E., Wolfe R.R., Salisbury L., Hendy E., Wu H., Walker S., Tacinelli A.M., Baum J.I. The potential role of beef and nutrients found in beef on outcomes of wellbeing in healthy adults 50 years of age and older: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Meat Sci. 2022;189:108830. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108830. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Wezemael L., Caputo V., Nayga R.M., Chryssochoidis G., Verbeke W. European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims: A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments. Food Policy. 2014;44:167–176. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.11.006. - DOI
    1. Chen B., Zhou K., Wang Y., Xie Y., Wang Z., Li P., Xu B. Insight into the mechanism of textural deterioration of myofibrillar protein gels at high temperature conditions. Food Chem. 2020;330:127186. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127186. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Du J., Zhou C., Xia Q., Wang Y., Geng F., He J., Sun Y., Pan D., Cao J. The effect of fibrin on rheological behavior, gelling properties and microstructure of myofibrillar proteins. LWT. 2022;153:112457. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112457. - DOI
    1. Meng X., Wu D., Zhang Z., Wang H., Wu P., Xu Z., Gao Z., Mintah B.K., Dabbour M. An overview of factors affecting the quality of beef meatballs: Processing and preservation. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022;10:1961–1974. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2812. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources