Hypnosis during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
- PMID: 38398292
- PMCID: PMC10889103
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm13040979
Hypnosis during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Abstract
(1) Background: Endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) is associated with a reduction in early morbidity and mortality compared with open repair. Procedures performed under hypnosis might represent an alternative to further reduce the risks related to general anesthesia (GA). This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of hypnosis and local anesthesia during EVAR. (2) Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent EVAR or fenestrated/branched EVAR (f/bEVAR) under hypnosis and local anesthesia (n = 28) between 2017 and 2019 were retrospectively studied and matched to control patients who underwent the same interventions under GA. (3) Results: There was neither a significant difference in the length of ICU stay (p = 0.06), nor in the occurrence of endoleaks, reintervention, and 30-day mortality rate (p = 1.00, 0.73, and 0.24, respectively). The hypnosis group had lower use of norepinephrine (maximum dose 0.04 ± 0.1 vs. 1.2 ± 4.0 mg·h-1, p < 0.001), shorter procedure duration (181.2 ± 71.4 vs. 214.3 ± 79.6 h, p = 0.04), and shorter length of stay (5.4 ± 3.2 vs. 8.4 ± 5.9 days, p = 0.002). (4) Conclusions: In this pioneering study, hypnosis during EVAR appears feasible and safe. It is associated with lower intraoperative use of norepinephrine, as well as procedure duration and length of in-hospital stay.
Keywords: anesthesia; endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR); endovascular surgery; hypnosis; hypnotherapy; non-pharmacological analgesia.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
-
- Franz R., Hartman J., Wright M. Comparison of Anesthesia Technique on Outcomes of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Five-Year Review of Monitored Anesthesia Care with Local Anesthesia vs. General or Regional Anesthesia. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2011;52:567–577. - PubMed
-
- Edwards M.S., Andrews J.S., Edwards A.F., Ghanami R.J., Corriere M.A., Goodney P.P., Godshall C.J., Hansen K.J. Results of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair with General, Regional, and Local/Monitored Anesthesia Care in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. J. Vasc. Surg. 2011;54:1273–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.054. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bakker E.J., van de Luijtgaarden K.M., van Lier F., Valentijn T.M., Hoeks S.E., Klimek M., Verhagen H.J.M., Stolker R.J. General Anaesthesia Is Associated with Adverse Cardiac Outcome after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Vasc. Surg. 2012;44:121–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.04.028. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources