Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan 23;14(2):166.
doi: 10.3390/life14020166.

Artificial Intelligence in Obstetric Anomaly Scan: Heart and Brain

Affiliations
Review

Artificial Intelligence in Obstetric Anomaly Scan: Heart and Brain

Iuliana-Alina Enache et al. Life (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The ultrasound scan represents the first tool that obstetricians use in fetal evaluation, but sometimes, it can be limited by mobility or fetal position, excessive thickness of the maternal abdominal wall, or the presence of post-surgical scars on the maternal abdominal wall. Artificial intelligence (AI) has already been effectively used to measure biometric parameters, automatically recognize standard planes of fetal ultrasound evaluation, and for disease diagnosis, which helps conventional imaging methods. The usage of information, ultrasound scan images, and a machine learning program create an algorithm capable of assisting healthcare providers by reducing the workload, reducing the duration of the examination, and increasing the correct diagnosis capability. The recent remarkable expansion in the use of electronic medical records and diagnostic imaging coincides with the enormous success of machine learning algorithms in image identification tasks.

Objectives: We aim to review the most relevant studies based on deep learning in ultrasound anomaly scan evaluation of the most complex fetal systems (heart and brain), which enclose the most frequent anomalies.

Keywords: anomaly scan; artificial intelligence; deep learning; fetal brain; fetal heart; pregnancy; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the method for study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A diagram illustrating the working methods.
Figure 3
Figure 3
AI studies regarding fetal heart structures.
Figure 4
Figure 4
AI studies regarding central nervous system anatomy.
Figure 5
Figure 5
AI studies regarding fetal heart rhythm interpretation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
AI studies regarding fetal biometry parameters and nuchal translucency estimations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Corsello G., Giuffrè M. Congenital malformations. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25((Suppl. S1)):25–29. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.664943. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Persson M., Cnattingius S., Villamor E., Söderling J., Pasternak B., Stephansson O., Neovius M. Risk of major congenital malformations in relation to maternal overweight and obesity severity: Cohort study of 1.2 million singletons. BMJ. 2017;357:j2563. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2563. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonnet D. Impacts of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases on outcomes. Transl. Pediatr. 2021;10:2241–2249. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-267. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cater S.W., Boyd B.K., Ghate S.V. Abnormalities of the Fetal Central Nervous System: Prenatal US Diagnosis with Postnatal Correlation. RadioGraphics. 2020;40:1458–1472. doi: 10.1148/rg.2020200034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McBrien A., Hornberger L.K. Early fetal echocardiography. Birth Defects Res. 2019;111:370–379. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1414. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources