Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb 6;17(2):210.
doi: 10.3390/ph17020210.

Integrating Artificial Intelligence and PET Imaging for Drug Discovery: A Paradigm Shift in Immunotherapy

Affiliations
Review

Integrating Artificial Intelligence and PET Imaging for Drug Discovery: A Paradigm Shift in Immunotherapy

Jeremy P McGale et al. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). .

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has the potential to become a powerful tool in drug discovery. This review aims to provide an overview of the current state of research and highlight the potential for this alliance to advance pharmaceutical innovation by accelerating the development and deployment of novel therapeutics. We previously performed a scoping review of three databases (Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL), identifying 87 studies published between 2018 and 2022 relevant to medical imaging (e.g., CT, PET, MRI), immunotherapy, artificial intelligence, and radiomics. Herein, we reexamine the previously identified studies, performing a subgroup analysis on articles specifically utilizing AI and PET imaging for drug discovery purposes in immunotherapy-treated oncology patients. Of the 87 original studies identified, 15 met our updated search criteria. In these studies, radiomics features were primarily extracted from PET/CT images in combination (n = 9, 60.0%) rather than PET imaging alone (n = 6, 40.0%), and patient cohorts were mostly recruited retrospectively and from single institutions (n = 10, 66.7%). AI models were used primarily for prognostication (n = 6, 40.0%) or for assisting in tumor phenotyping (n = 4, 26.7%). About half of the studies stress-tested their models using validation sets (n = 4, 26.7%) or both validation sets and test sets (n = 4, 26.7%), while the remaining six studies (40.0%) either performed no validation at all or used less stringent methods such as cross-validation on the training set. Overall, the integration of AI and PET imaging represents a paradigm shift in drug discovery, offering new avenues for more efficient development of therapeutics. By leveraging AI algorithms and PET imaging analysis, researchers could gain deeper insights into disease mechanisms, identify new drug targets, or optimize treatment regimens. However, further research is needed to validate these findings and address challenges such as data standardization and algorithm robustness.

Keywords: PET; PET/CT; artificial intelligence; drug discovery; immunotherapy; radiomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection process for the original 2022 review and the present PET and PET/CT second-look analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of 15 articles that met our inclusion criteria. (A) Imaging modality employed (PET indicates 18F-FDG-PET imaging, CT indicates computed tomography); (B) data collection strategy classified by time course (retrospective or prospective) and center involvement for patient recruitment (single or multiple institutions); (C) primary predictive aim of the AI model trained in the study: prognosis (e.g., measures of overall or progression-free survival, or durable clinical benefit), tumor phenotype (e.g., PD-L1 receptor expression), treatment response (e.g., predictions of clinical endpoints as defined by RECIST 1.1 or similar criteria), tumor immune microenvironment (e.g., tumoral infiltration of CD8+ T-cells); (D) validation method used for AI models.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. O’Brien S.G., Guilhot F., Larson R.A., Gathmann I., Baccarani M., Cervantes F., Cornelissen J.J., Fischer T., Hochhaus A., Hughes T., et al. Imatinib Compared with Interferon and Low-Dose Cytarabine for Newly Diagnosed Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:994–1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022457. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fu K., Xie F., Wang F., Fu L. Therapeutic Strategies for EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Osimertinib Resistance. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2022;15:173. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01391-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shaw A.T., Kim D.-W., Nakagawa K., Seto T., Crinó L., Ahn M.-J., De Pas T., Besse B., Solomon B.J., Blackhall F., et al. Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:2385–2394. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214886. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vanneman M., Dranoff G. Combining Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies in Cancer Treatment. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2012;12:237–251. doi: 10.1038/nrc3237. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hockings H., Miller R.E. The Role of PARP Inhibitor Combination Therapy in Ovarian Cancer. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2023;15:17588359231173183. doi: 10.1177/17588359231173183. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources